Benchmark Dac1 HDR vs Bel Canto 2.5????

FWIW I don't use the Bel Canto these days and prefer the EMM Labs/Playback.

One thing I do miss from the Bel Canto is the ability to play DSD which you can get from the new Benchmark 2. Not sure how it sounds tho.

Another option I'd consider is the TEAC UD-501. It doesnt have a volume control but it does DSD as well and I like the rich sound it creates.

It's quite cheap as well. Does 32/384 and up to 2xDSD.

I had the DAC1Pre and moved from that to a DAC3.5. I found that move to be an upgrade. I think the DAC2.5 is similar to the basic DAC3.5 with the LNS power supply.

The Benchmark was clinical sounding and sterile compared to the Benchmark which sounded fuller without any loss in detail.

I then upgraded the DAC3.5 with the VBS and then upgraded the 3.5 to MkII, and also had the REF power cables.

The HDR is fundamentally the same as the DAC1 Pre, just with a remote controlled volume pot.

I preferred the DAC3.5 via the Pre3 but with the 3.5MkII, I preferred that direct.

3.5 with LNS has a higher noise floor vs 3.5 with VBS.