Balanced vs. Unbalanced Inputs

actually...it seems like the edit feature is gone, even before another post......gues we will have to "proof read" damn!

Sorry, that should have been guess...not gues, and I should have done a big "A" on actually.....
P.S. Actually is the best word to use if you're trying to do Sean Connery...

DAMN IT

glen: the "edit" feature works only until a post follows yours. -kelly

Sorry I meant to say balanced in's on the demo a amp at home line above."HEY what happened to that cool edit feature"

You don't say if your source has balanced out's. If not then there's no point to an amp with balanced in's.

The benefit of balanced connections is increased noise rejection if (and a big if) all the equipment uses true balanced circuitry.

As has already been said - balanced connectors don't insure balanced electronics.

I would expect to here a subtle improvment with balanced cable between the pre and amp. Are you going AES/EBU on the source? The fact that your pre has balanced out's tells me you have already commited to some nice gear. And from that I will assume you have purchased decent speakers. One can then conclude that you are running out of money fast. If possible see if you can demo an amp at home that has balanced outs. Even a balanced stereo amp connected to your main L/R might sway you one way or the other. Alot of people here are penny pinchers(I will get bashed for that one) and will stear you away from balanced. But I for one am looking forward to it on my next 5 channel amp though I can only use the front three channels with my current PRE.

Many of the so-called multi-amps with balanced inputs actually are not quite true 'balanced'. Don't waste your money, just go with rca inputs. Can't go wrong with Sherbourn, BTW.