Ayon Triton Integrated or Keep my BAT?


Hello All-

Anyone have experience with the Ayon Triton Integrated Amp?

http://www.ayonaudiousa.com/english/triton/f-triton.htm

I'm considering upgrading my BAT VK-300SE and this integrated looks pretty interesting. Not much chatter here on the unit but there were favorable comments coming out of RMAF. My BAT is currently driving Dali MS4s and my souces are a Modwright Transporter and a Basis 2500 Signature TT (Vector3/Shelter 90x/GNSC-EAR 834P). Audience AU24e all around. So what say you A'goners?

Thanks!
cbd0815

Showing 8 responses by cbd0815

Hey Guys-

The Ayon Triton has landed! I just finished uppacking the triple box and positioning it on the stand to beging the thawing process. Kinda cold here in the Washington, DC suburbs (12 miles from the White House). The unit is much bigger that I expected and it definitely looks all business! The BAT - Ayon faceoff will begin this weekend. Stay tuned...
Hey Jfrech. Definitely like the BAT sounds and I have owned their separates in the past (you may remember my 52SE listing). Just trying to find a one box solution that moves in the direction of the BAT pre/BAT tube amp combo. I'm hoping that the Triton is a move in that direction. Unfortunately, they do not have a dealer in my area and I'm trying to arrange a 30 day home trial. How did your preamp experiment go? You mentioned trying out another brand.
Thanks John. I asked him about his experience a few days ago and looking forward to his response.
I think I saw a black vk52se hit the site the other day. I'm sure you'll have many more opportunities this year Jfrech. I'll be doing a Ayon Triton versus BAT Vk300x SE shootout later this month. I'll have both units in my system by 1/23 and I'll post findings.
Encouraging reports guys. I expect to have the Triton in two weeks, and I'm looking forward to the shootout with my BAT integrated. Sounds like the BAT will be facing some stiff competition!
Tonight I had time to do some side-by-side listening with the BAT and Ayon. The Ayon reminded me of everything I liked about tube amplification - smoother & fuller tone, along with a more spacious presentation. The Ayon also reminded me of the drawbacks I've experienced with tubes - bass that tends to be a little too fat & slow, and a less resolved presentation across the frequency spectrum. I'm really surprised how well the BAT hung in there with the Ayon. I expected the Ayon to smoke the BAT, but it didn't. Too early for conclusions but it looks like the BAT will be putting up a fight. More to come...
Hey Audio852- the source I'm using right now is a Modwright Transporter network music player (tube output stage and platinum power upgrade). The Ayon is driving a pair of Dali Euphonia MS4s. The Modwright Transporter easily outperformed my two prior CDPs (Sim Audio Moon Eclipse LE & Resolution Audio GNSC modified Opus 21), so I'm pretty confident with what is up front. I wish I had my vinyl rig set up. I'm waiting on a few upgrade components so it is still sitting in the box. About the bass, I'm listening in triode this morning and I'm noticing that the bass seems tighter, while retaining the rounder texture. Sounding pretty good! If I remember correctly, the B&Ws are not the most efficient speaker; right? Would you mind sharing your experiences in going between the more efficient Freemonts and the B&W 800s? I’m wondering if speaker efficiency may be an issue on my end.
Okay- I’m going with the Ayon Triton! The BAT VK300x-SE is for sale and the Triton has found a home in my audio rack. I have been a long time BAT fan and have owned at least eight different BAT amps, preamps, and integrated amps over the years. I have nothing negative to say about the 300x-SE. It is a solid performer but I definitely prefer what I’m hearing from the Triton on my Dali MS4s. I’m not sure I have a handle on all of the appropriate terms to use to explain the differentiating factors, but here goes: (1) soundstage goes to the Triton – definitely more dimensional with more front to back depth. On certain cuts, I sense that walk through feel that I’ve heard others reference, (2) bass goes to the Triton – I was a bit surprised by this. I expected the SS piece to offer deeper bass, but the Triton held its own here. What set the Triton apart was the bass note delineation, and a kind of roundness of the notes. The bass on the Triton has a lot of texture which added richness. While the 300x-SE bass may have been a touch tighter, it was at the expense of the roundness and texture I mentioned, (3) resolution – tie. The cool thing about the Triton is that it presents richness and texture without giving up resolution. Ayon has found a very good balance here. The 300x-SE presents a highly resolved picture, but it is more like turning up the sharpness control on your TV. The picture seems more detailed and crisp, but everything has sharp edges. Again, nothing negative about the 300x-SE, just different flavors, (4) tone again to the Triton –I think this has to do with the roundness of notes and the texture I previously mentioned. Everything has more body and a natural feel. Both male and female vocal sound more like a live breathing person is singing. The difference is pretty big here…, (5) musical versatility – tie. At first I thought the Triton would not be able to handle more complex and upbeat music, and it would be limited to the jazz side of my collection. Well, it does excel with jazz compositions (50% of my listening), but it is solid with Rock, R&B, Reggae, Soca, Calypso, and Hip-Hop (yes- Dead Prez, Mos Def, Talib Kaweli & The Roots are in my rotation!). The 300x-SE is a versatile beast, and handles everything well, (6) user interface to the 300x-SE – not even close here. The 300x-SE is a fully featured integrated with many programmable features. The Triton is basic in function, and I don’t think Ayon’s intent was to build an integrated that would complete with products like the BAT in this regard, (7) cool factor – Triton by a mile! Have you seen it? No need to explain