2. misc-audio
  3. 1147149999

avoiding component purchase errors :part 2

in my previous discussion, i mentioned the importance of being aware of personality traits which may conflict with the sound that results froma particular component selection.

it is important that one be aware of one's preferences. if one has no idea what type of presentation is enjoyable, the result will be numerous purchases and sales in the quest of finding one's audio nirvana. one may be lucky at some point and achieve it, or one may continue to buy and sell for years and years.

it's a good thing that seious audio hobbyists do not "change" their spouses as often as they change their equipment.

if one has a desire to create a sound that conflicts with one's psychological makeup, the equipment will change frequently, but the persoanlity will probably not change.

better to have your tastes in sound consistent with your psychological make up, once you have figured out both.

as an example, consider the dimensions of stimulus intensity and complexity, and consider that most manufacturers design for maximum resolution, while the paragon of a high quality stereo system is also maximal resolution.

human being differe with respect to sensitivity of nervous systems to income stimuli and their ability to process data in a time fashion.

if you overload your brain and nervous system, you will take an action to achieve a comfort level.

if you want more and more detail and clarity, you may reach a point weher you have excede your threshold of tolerance.

such a situation puts your desires in conflict with your physiological and psychological capabilities. this is a recipe for eroors adn more buying and selling.

numerous studies have demonstrated that an intermediate level of complexity and intensity is an optimal state.

what levels of complexity and intensity are ideal for an individual, must be ascertained, creatively by that individual.

one need not be ashamed to admit that backing away from a high resolution stereo system may be better for one's health.

too many of us are concerned about being criticized by others for liking a sound which others consider inferior.

most of the time we listen alone and it is better to please ourselves than please the few friends who come over and share our listening experiences.
mrtennis

Showing 5 responses by mrtennis

mrtennis OP
3,295 posts
 
the point of my thread is to provide ideas for avoiding them.

nobody has commented on mistaken purchases and the resulting frustration of admitting the misrake and then selling a component.

does anyone ever regret a component purchase?

does anyone try to learn from a mistake and try to avoid another mistake ?
mrtennis OP
3,295 posts
 
gentlemen, i have a background in psychology, economics and mathematics.

my motivation for my threads is to create a dialogue. get people to think about their own behavior. perhaps, as we all do, we will realize we are doing things that are not in our own interests. by examining our assumptions and attitudes, our behavior may become more constructive.

i have been criticized for starting debates, debating myself, taking unconventional positions, and in general rocking the boat.

yes, i admit i do all that, as i am by nature very inquisitive. why do people behave in certain ways ?

i try to apply certain principles of psychology to uncover the deeper meanings of our behavior as it applies to listening preferences and purchasing behavior.

yes, you may call me unusual, because i have a very analytical perspective.

i hope something good comes out of my posts, even if people get angry at me.

as far as part iii on this subject, i think the sentiment doesn't favor it. i may have more to say on this subject in the future.
mrtennis OP
3,295 posts
 
hi sbrtoy, if all you want to do is change the sound of your stereo system using trial and error, you don't need the advice and opinions of other people.
it is a challenge to build a stereo system which sounds wonderful to your ears. what purpose does it serve to tear it down and recreate it ?

i guess i may be onto something regarding my comment about persoanlity and speaker preference.

the psychology of audio behavior is very interesting.

maybe i'll write a book. don't worry i won't name names.
mrtennis OP
3,295 posts
 
9rw, you just gave me away. i don't know anything. but to know i know nothing would mean i know something--quite a paradox.

and you sir, and your ilk have all the knowledge that i lack. thank you for enlightening me and pointing out my ignorance. perhaps, you too need some anger management. how is your blood pressure ? have you seen your therapist lately ?

if your superior intellect has been operating you would have noticed that i have used the word opinion several times.

therefore my comments do not represent knowledge. i never asserted that i know anything.

anything i have said has been my opinion.

i'm sorry you are taking this so personally. it's just a discussion and fun. lighten up. as for my speling errors, i type fast and make mistakes.
mrtennis OP
3,295 posts
 
hi 9rw, either you are more of a comic than mr g, or you are not taking responsibility for your statements.

using the words "irritate" and "we think you're full of yourself", indicates that you are offended, annoyed, over reacting or perhaps posturing.

in any case your tone is scolding, like a parent.
calm down and stop taking my remarks so seriously. it's only audio opinions.

there is no knowledge here, why get so exercised over trivia ?
More to discover