2. misc-audio
  3. 182230-20253

Audiphile Press: Am I jaded, experienced, or has it declined?

I remember Audio, Stereophile and TAS as an older teen getting me excited about music reproduction and technology. Getting out to listen to speakers and find gear I could afford to take me to music Nirvana.

I still like the gear, still like talking about it, comparing tech, sharing experiences and advice, but I can’t remember the last time I really thought "wow, that’s good writing!"

How about you?

Has too much press devolved to covering only the most expensive gear?  Do we lack better international gear coverage?  Does it all look like it could be easily written by an AI chat bot?

erik_squires

Showing 2 responses by clearthinker

clearthinker's avatar
clearthinker
1,582 posts
 

Please don't quote chatbots here.  What they write is totally bland because it is programmed not to offend anyone.  As Mr Dylan once said 'it says nuttin about nuttin'.

Don't forget we can all send in this rubbish.

clearthinker's avatar
clearthinker
1,582 posts
 

I loved Stereophile while John Atkinson was editor.

You may criticise him for some mild equivocation but Jim Austin gets down my throat: dogmatism is worse.  I am considering packing it in but the entry price is so low I still see value even though I have been on my 'forever' system a few years now.  Yes, the huge number of ads is annoying but that's what keeps the price low.

More to discover