Audioquest Pearl HDMI vs ?


I've finally gotten around to upgrading my "old fashioned" tube tv to a new Panasonic Plasma ST30 and have been told that I should get a HDMI cable to connect the video from my High Definition cable box to the new Plasma tv. I will not be using the HDMI for audio though....I will take the RCA analog outs from the cable box directly to my Linn Integrated amplifier.

All I will need is about a 2 meter length. Do various HDMI brands differ significantly as far as the picture quality is concerned or if I go with the $40 all copper Audioquest Pearl, will that be well enough?

Has anyone compared the video quality of the Pearl with anything else?

Thank you!
no_regrets

Showing 1 response by agisthos

I have had the following HDMI cables,

Chord Silver Active Plus
QED Reference
QED Signature
Kordz EVX Master Series

None of these are cheap, and the video quality difference between them was either negligable or non-existant (placebo).

But this all changed when I recently purchased the Mapleshade Vivlink plus HDMI. It provided a true leap in video quality with much more picture detail coming through than the other cables.

I only mention this, because Mapleshade claim they put this cable against the $1500 Audioquest diamond in a viewing panel shootout and it bested it in every area.

It is $165 for the plus version in 2m size, but worth every dollar and the best video upgrade I have done. The only negative is the construction, totally fragile and totally hairshirt, you only have to see the pictures to realise this.