As someone who just started out about a year ago with tubes, I found Audiogon participants to be more inviting and approachable than the Aylum inmates. Though I have a lot to learn, I'm always ready to try to return the favor by giving as much as I can to those who pose questions. Perhaps the response indicates that the people who frequent Audiogon are doing a fine job and don't really need their input.
Audiogon/Asylum and magazine reviewers posts
For whatever reason(s), I have always prefered Audiogon over the Asylum; a few weeks ago there was this post on the Asylum, "Is Stereophile Abstaining From AA ?". Many on here may already know that several reviewers do participate on AudioAsylum. I posted this question to that post, "My question is, why don't they frequent Audiogon as well? Any response JA?" I received the following reply from the reviewer Kal Rubison, "I monitor Audiogon but there's rarely anything worth commenting on."
This post isn't anything against Kal, I was just curious if others that frequent both sites find that AA has more meaningful posts?
This post isn't anything against Kal, I was just curious if others that frequent both sites find that AA has more meaningful posts?