I don't think anyone here is weird enough to push the line that a magic wood from the Amazon jungles will give you that special sound.
That's a keeper.
Audio Science Review = "The better the measurement, the better the sound" philosophy
"Audiophiles are Snobs" Youtube features an idiot! He states, with no equivocation, that $5,000 and $10,000 speakers sound equally good and a $500 and $5,000 integrated amp sound equally good. He is either deaf or a liar or both!
There is a site filled with posters like him called Audio Science Review. If a reasonable person posts, they immediately tear him down, using selected words and/or sentences from the reasonable poster as100% proof that the audiophile is dumb and stupid with his money. They also occasionally state that the high end audio equipment/cable/tweak sellers are criminals who commit fraud on the public. They often state that if something scientifically measures better, then it sounds better. They give no credence to unmeasurable sound factors like PRAT and Ambiance. Some of the posters music choices range from rap to hip hop and anything pop oriented created in the past from 1995.
Have any of audiogon (or any other reasonable audio forum site) posters encountered this horrible group of miscreants?
Quite so. ASR exists and will continue to do so for those who desire information and education which is demonstrably not acceptable to many on this forum. Why do people here who have an issue with ASR even bother looking at what ASR has to convey about a product? Like anti-smokers or a long standing smoker of a range of brands based on their taste or aroma and other subjective qualities maintaining their angst about a site that discusses the best brands of cigarettes or tobacco based on a chemical analysis of the cigarettes or tobacco (there are several thousand chemicals). Of course the best brands site will block you. |
Exactly, which "party" do you speak of? I know you can , because you have been very careful in what you feel as the defining the thresholds required by competent engineers. Step 2 is open to interpretation. DBT is another topic - not a bullet point. |
You have made an unsubstantiated accusation. Prove it beyond reasonable doubt for all on Audiogon to bookmark. For the record. Don’t assume that the readers of your many comments here have an IQ in the double digits. By the way, Amir sometimes also has issues with correct punctuation and grammar skills.. Maybe you should correct him on that, too. |
The brother John Birch is unknown to me. Should that be a question rather than an assertion as it is phrased, the answer is obviously no. |
The measurements provided are what the audio analyser Audio Precision APx555 spits out. |
Or, take output impedance. The spec may say 100 ohms or whatever, but at low frequencies, say at 20hz, it may be several thousand ohms. The spec is a single data point.. That is not science, and in fact quite the opposite to what you state. It is marketing, and that is OK if you are of a forgiving nature which I know many here on AG are. I only know what I said in my first paragraph because of the knowledge revealed by ASR in a review of a Schiit pre-amp some years ago where a full frequency sweep was taken. That is science - total transparency, pimples!! |
I’d enjoy you providing links to a sample of those published reviews should you be so kind. I am always keen to know more about damping factor principles. |
Fixed. |
To an outsider, perhaps. In reality it is all prompted by an increase in scientific and technical awareness thanks to ASR and a consequent rapidly diminishing appetite for uber expensive gear. |
Excuse me? You are too afraid to say the word despite being full of it on this thread? Declare your interest in having ASR discredited. You are not a troll, just puerile and probably out of your depth on a forum seeking adult discussion... |
Please do so. edit - I just saw the previous post after posting that request. Since when has a poster using the derogatory and racist word/phrase/description "Chi-fi" been an acceptable contributor to AudioGon? |
|
I’m pleaased that the collective we alllow @quiet his opinion - the tribe on this occasion are most generous. Your own character must be at issue first. Should AG mods disagree, then let them say it. |
That can only be construed as an online threat. AGon mods - who is this guy? |
Your circa teenage daughter has a high end stereo system in her dorm room? That's swell. Entitled.
|
So, she may take a class in psychology and perhaps learn the nuances of projectionism, narcissistic behaviour and other related unacceptable social behaviour. |
Please share the circumstances under which you were banned by ASR. Feel free to be expansive. |
Oh yes - maroon is something you shared with me that time. I agree, I prefer the colours of ambience.
|
Says he who has posted 14 comments here bagging ASR. It was huge news, recently. My advice - rule number one - before you attack, know your enemy. Just the basics is necessary, but to do so this is not sufficient. You didn't know. Children don’t understand the strategy and logistics of war. |
That is tremendous news. @laoman The skilled engineers and those who measure some very important metrics may no longer fear your clawed talon. |
I disagree about truth bombs being activated. There is a great deal of second hand womens kinda gossip - hence my surprise when you admitted that you did not know about the PA5 debacle. |
@kota1 Of course it is sexist. Get over it. In my current occupation I work with 40 women and 4 men. Women are light years ahead of us naive blokes being able to get away with un-corroborated gossip. True by definition. I log on to AG and see, oh, I’m back at work. More women pretending to be men. |
@laoman Given your open hostility and generally confronting and aggressive manner, would it make any difference to you and the tag team here at AG were Amir to answer any of your leading questions? If so, how? |
I understand. Thankyou on this occasion for your generosity of spirit in explaining to others about your own predicament. In psychology it is called projectionism. In the meantime, others may wish to know the answer to my quite simple question - is that too difficult? |
Name a few of these accredited journals. Include their accreditation status by the appropriate body. |
Maybe Amir chooses to respond only to people with higher functioning cognitive abilities. Not interesting at all for those here who watch what you post. |
Is this a reason why many on the forum are dismayed at the rigorous and hard marking provided by Amir? You are entitled to not concern yourself with buying the best, despite its modest price.. Nobody cares except the rapidly failing high end components bricks and mortar market. And the site we are currently on - enjoy it while you can. |
I am pleased to know that your business in high-end audiophile gear is good. I think that it is important for everyone to know this for future reference. |
Some childish women may interpret facts as sarcasm or being funny. To that I have no retort. |
Because you introduce this aspect of yourself, it is now imperative that you elaborate for the avoidance of doubt.
|
@moto_man I suggest a good start would be to compare like with like, and at the most basic this would mean the same AWG. Same length, same connectors. Anything else is meaningless because you may be comparing things that are not alike in their physical characteristics. If stock is 20 AWG, and the $$$ ones are say 12 or 14 AWG and are a few metres shorter, yes, you will hear a difference. They will measure differently. |
Its all rather odd, perhaps confined to American culture, because I have not seen this level of self pity anywhere else.. Like if a bloke walks into the women’s shower room and is not only surprised when he is booted out, but then goes onto pontificate at the standards observed in their shower room and the poor quality of nakedness he observed. |
Which reminds me of Robert Harley’s contention, not just recently but also from some years ago, that audio components follow his own law of increasing/accelerating marginal returns (as opposed to decreasing). So, if you spend another 10%, you will be gifted with something that is more than 10% better in every respect (appreciating that this has nothing to do with the level of expenditure, rather, a comparison between two levels). |
That policy must be particular to America. In my country, there are conditions on the reasons you may wish for and be provided a refund - not liking it is not one of them. Such a liberal policy in America has unintended consequences on a number of levels. But that is what is known as micro-economics and out of bounds on this esteemed forum. |
ASR has possibly hundreds of active members and dozens of threads, without checking. Such power of control that you attribute to Amir! The bloke must never sleep. I’d bannish myself on a whim were I to insist on pushing the general guidelines to such a point that I became the antipathy of what the spirit of the forum is intended to convey. I made an innocent mistake on an unrelated forum a while ago and was banished for making light of a certain person in high office. I was unaware of certain strict protocols. I own my mistake, however innocent it may have been. |
Those are quite astonishing statistics. I am actually very careful to only buy from vendors who do not offer any marketing guarantees as to their generous return policy. . Think. |
This is tremendous information that you share. I, and perhaps other contributors on this thread, thankyou for sharing your profound epiphany at having found someone with a physics education after having visited every stereo shop in SoCal. |
Not really interesting. Consumer law guarantees certain rights to both vendor and buyer which cannot be denied for a year, maybe two. The statement you quoted is a business decision by the vendor - time limit 30 days or so? Who pays for all the fuses that are returned within that time period, because they didn’t like them? Either you make a product that people wanna keep for the duration of their expected lives, or refund them if it is faulty. Not simply because ya tried and didn't like - that is such an expensive business decision whereby the consumer takes on the risks of other consumers before him who were didn't like the fuse. |
Now we are off topic but with the grace of the mods - that policy is common for used goods, of course. |