Audio Research Ref 110 vs. ARC HD220


Has anyone heard these two amps side by side. I am familiar with technical/theoretical differences, but I have yet to hear them in a way where I could compare. I know the 110 is all tubes vs the hybrid design of the HD220. I have an LS26 and a CD3 MkII already. I currently own Vandersteen 3a sigs and am strongly considering the Vandersteen quatros. Given my equipment what are your thoughts about those two amps. I am concerned about the 110's out capabilities since I occasionally like to listen at loud volume levels. Both speakers are in essentially the same price range so price is of little issue. I have yet to see/read a review of the 220 and I know the 110 has been enthusiastically acclaimed.
Thanks for your input.
128x128jhconnor

Showing 1 response by tomer_tsin


As an owner of a Reference 110, I would say that if you want the maximum tube “bloom”, musicality, and midrange presence, the REF110 will do a wonderful job, as long as your room is not too large and you do not need to play at extremely loud levels, for long periods. But to realize the full bass dynamics and speed of the Vandersteen 3a sigs, the HD220 can do do a better job. And you can play as loud as you want, for as long as you want, with no output tubes to replace. One other thing: if you often experience some line-voltage variation such as a dip of 8-10 volts or more, then I would also lean toward the HD220. Tube amps need consistent line voltage for both best performance and best service life from the output tubes.
I think, either amp will give you wonderful results, with slightly different sonic “shadings.”
Hope this helps you make your decision.

Tomer