I'll second the LS5 - I have the mkii version
I have owned the LS2 and it is hard and grainy on the top end. I have done demos of the LS22 and 25 and ref1 on my home system - the ls 5 is clearly much more open, vibrant and engaging, no contest and well worth the extra money. You would have to go up to the ref 2 or the Bat pre Jfox suggests.
THe balanced inputs are no problem, I use a ph2 so I am balanced on my phono stage. I use adapter plugs on my cd front end and dvd player.
As for tubes - some nos telefunken's really make this preamp sound fabulous - check out fletch here on audiogon for the best vintage tubes, he sure did my system some good
I have owned the LS2 and it is hard and grainy on the top end. I have done demos of the LS22 and 25 and ref1 on my home system - the ls 5 is clearly much more open, vibrant and engaging, no contest and well worth the extra money. You would have to go up to the ref 2 or the Bat pre Jfox suggests.
THe balanced inputs are no problem, I use a ph2 so I am balanced on my phono stage. I use adapter plugs on my cd front end and dvd player.
As for tubes - some nos telefunken's really make this preamp sound fabulous - check out fletch here on audiogon for the best vintage tubes, he sure did my system some good