Audio Research Classic 30: how does it compare to ARC current power amps?


Hello!

I hope that you would be all fine and with some positive perspective in front of you regarding the virus and life in general.

Is there anyone among you all who could answer to this question? 

Is the Classic 30 still a winner in terms of accuracy and musicality compared to, ie:

- Reference 110
- Reference 75 / 75SE
- Reference 150 / 150SE

What I'm trying to understand is if it could be a wise move to sell my Classic 30 changing it with one of the above mentioned amps?

I don't want to give up, and possibly increase, to Cl 30 accuracy, imaging, microcontrast, details, and at the same time I would like to increase power, bass control and dynamics as well...

Am I on the right way?

Thank you very much!

Mario from Venice, Italy
128x128shastasheen65

Showing 1 response by arro222

@ shastasheen
We used to sell ARC stuff from the late 80's to 2008. They were not for everyone looking for the "tube" sound. ARC stuff always had harmonics that induced a "clarity" to their reproduction as opposed to "beautiful".
That being said, the new stuff brings forth all of the old "house sound" in an even more delineated way. Bass is crispier. Midrange more frontal and highs more shimmering. While there might have been some growing pains while Mr. Johnson was looking to improve the ARC sound until his passing, dryness is gone in my opinion while maintaining  the "heft and weight" reproduction should have.
If you are looking for "realism", the new equipment brings that home in spades. 
In attending an audio show in Las Vegas, Nevada in 2012, the most realistic sound I have ever heard was with the Reference 150 separates, their cd player at the time, through Verity speakers.
Some there turned away while I stood in amazement that this reproduction could come so close to realism.
It remains a matter of taste.