Jl ... I started a thread some time ago about the same issue.
I own the ARC Ref CD-8, which has a similar circuit topology and uses the same DAC as the CD-5. I have little or no interest ... yet ... in the DAC features of the CD-6 or Ref CD-9.
The question I asked in my thread was whether the CD-6/9 redbook CD performance was significantly better than the the CD-5/8. So far, I haven't gotten many comments back. So I'm glad you picked the issue up again.
My thought is that if I want to explore DAC applications later on, I don't need to drop a small fortune now on making an investment in the CD-6/9. There are other less expensive paths to take.
So having said all of this, I renew my question -- does the CD-6/9 do a better job with just redbook CD playback than the CD-5/8??
I own the ARC Ref CD-8, which has a similar circuit topology and uses the same DAC as the CD-5. I have little or no interest ... yet ... in the DAC features of the CD-6 or Ref CD-9.
The question I asked in my thread was whether the CD-6/9 redbook CD performance was significantly better than the the CD-5/8. So far, I haven't gotten many comments back. So I'm glad you picked the issue up again.
My thought is that if I want to explore DAC applications later on, I don't need to drop a small fortune now on making an investment in the CD-6/9. There are other less expensive paths to take.
So having said all of this, I renew my question -- does the CD-6/9 do a better job with just redbook CD playback than the CD-5/8??