Well, the AC-2 always seemed a little more bright and the than the Denon 103D I used to have. More like a moving magnet sound than moving coil.
I'm still not sure what to think over the 103D verses the 103R or 103SA, though. Some the 103D some the 103R / SA.
I changed to a Moon LP-5.3 from the LP-3 active amplifier so I can tune it better to more cartridges. Most seem to feel the 103 series is a pretty good, not perfect, match to the SME 3009 series III tone arm. I don't have a thousand records, so price is important.
103D 8.5G, 5 x 10^6, 40-ohms
103SA 9.7g, 5 x 10^6, 100-ohms
AC-2 9.5g, 15 x 10^6, 50-ohms
The quatros woods probably would excell with a warmer sounding cartridge. The are super fast sounding, and the Accuphase can be dryer sounding as a result.
I'm still not sure what to think over the 103D verses the 103R or 103SA, though. Some the 103D some the 103R / SA.
I changed to a Moon LP-5.3 from the LP-3 active amplifier so I can tune it better to more cartridges. Most seem to feel the 103 series is a pretty good, not perfect, match to the SME 3009 series III tone arm. I don't have a thousand records, so price is important.
103D 8.5G, 5 x 10^6, 40-ohms
103SA 9.7g, 5 x 10^6, 100-ohms
AC-2 9.5g, 15 x 10^6, 50-ohms
The quatros woods probably would excell with a warmer sounding cartridge. The are super fast sounding, and the Accuphase can be dryer sounding as a result.