Arguments devolve on threads to wordsmithing contests

To wit: 
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/the-science-of-cables?lastpage=true&page=8#1709051

Communication is pretty fundamental. Most understand the literal meaning of words when strung together in cogent (or not so cogent) sentences. Only the context of emotional nuance is missing owing to the medium. Yet when folks engage in the battle of the quotations, all hope of agreement seems lost as to the meaning held within content between the 2 quotation marks. 

Geoff is the whack a mole champ. 

@millercarbon That is how folks in molecular biology felt after Watson and Crick discovered the DNA double helix structure. Crick literally opined about virtually every topic in the area, leaving nothing for most others to discover in a new way. Lol

Eventually...maybe. She shared it with W&C. Wilkens shared the Nobel. She would have had she been alive. 

Hey, I never said W&C were honest scientists. But RF got it wrong. 

“>>>>Correction. Everyone has his own field, after all.”

Geoff single-handedly wiped the female and “other” genders out of the lexicon of candidates for possessive pronouns.

Uber, "five minute" as modifying "argument" is likely better as "five-minute." And "argument" has only 1 letter "e," while "full half hour" might be better as "one-half hour" ("full half" is the same as "half"). Lol

glupson, I don’t know. Glad you enjoy this tho.

Reminds me of an article about reading comprehension wherein the author provided an example of a paragraph including misspellings of every word. No issues with reading it. Lol

larry, +1
roddmaan, +1

larry, I created this thread to divert commentary away from a different thread when things seem to get a bit testy. This thread has no other purpose than that.