Are Recording Engineers "Certified"?


It often amazes me the differences in recording quality from one album to another. I would imagine that each and every studio, recording electronics system, and engineer would each have their own "sonic signature". But how is the recording engineer evaluated? Other than a possible degree or diploma from an accredited school, is there an auditory test that they are subjected to?

Does the record company just trust their credentials and put that engineer at a mixing board and say "Here, record this"? Is that engineer's hearing evaluated. Are they required to take annual hearing tests? Who is the person or group of persons, that give the final "thumbs up" to a recording?

And who decides if the final recorded product is of "acceptable sonic standards"?

Does a record company assign certain recording engineers to certain musical performers? George Martin for example, recorded classical performances for many years before recording The Beatles. I have seen Bob Ludwig's name on hundreds of recordings in a lot of different types of musical styles and disciplines of music. There are many notable recording engineers out there and obviously have been around long enough to have established their credentials.

I know that this a myriad of questions, but I think most of you understand the focus of these questions.
buscis2

Showing 2 responses by rives

There are a number of schools. Some give you a "diploma"--which has absolutely no credentials except that you went to that school. Others offer an associates degreed program. None of this guarantees a good quality recording engineer. It is a very interesting question you ask, particularly in light of the advent (yes we are just barely at the advent) of multi channel. There are only a handful of engineers that know how to really mix in that format and there are basically no schools that teach the new formats. Some of the finest recording engineers have had no formal training--they had the gift and learned at the school of hard knocks. I'll bet if you looked at some of the best recorded music you would find that to be the case, but today the schools help open doors for those that want to get into the business.
Trelja--no offense at all. School opens doors. Degrees open more than "dimplomas", but it's what you do with yourself that matters. Sometimes you might get an opportunity without the formal training, but honestly, after you've been in the field (any field) for a number of years, no one really cares about your schooling--they care about your accomplishments.

Buscis2--The answer is "yes". Each engineer is using his art to mix what he thinks it should be. I agree with you that I don't want to be "in" the band. I want to listen to the band--maybe in the 7th or 8th row, but not sitting on top of the guitarist. Multi-channel has the ability to put you anywhere--in fact some day you may have a little joy stick and can stear yourself through the venue and hear what it sounds like in different locations (okay--that's a long ways away--but don't be surprised in 5 years when Yamaha is anouncing just that technology with DSP to hear something in 12 different venues) But that's my opinion, and right now there are many opinions. Right now it's still somewhat of an experimentation phase, and I think over time it will settle down. Think of when stereo first came out and there were all these sounds bouncing back and forth across the speakers. The engineers did it because they could. After a while the "golly gee wiz" factor wore off and the goal was to produce something more realistic. I think the same will happen for the multi-channel mixes. (I sure hope so).