I own the Ohm-Walsh 5000 so I cannot make a direct comparison with the Micros or the 1000s. Is the sound "...around the listener....not distinct or detailed...kind of amorphous or nonspecific in imaging or sound staging"? No, not if set-up correctly and I don't find that proper placement is difficult to achieve.
I'll not repeat in so many words what I think have been accurate descriptions of how the Ohms present music than have already been made by Map, martykl, polarin, and bondmanp. Each, in their own way, has done an masterful job of describing their experiences.
I agree with many of the comments above.
- Most apt for me, which is why I will always keep them, is their being described as having a "sociable soundstage". I rarely sit still and listen to an entire record. I appreciate the fact that I can get up and move around and the soundstage does not completely collapse.
- I do enjoy I can move quite a ways to either side and still have a very "organic" presentation with remarkably "solid, stable imaging".
- I can sit with my wife and we both agree the music has a "sense of weight and body". You'll not have that experience with Maggies - at least for the both of you.
- It is definitely has "non-fatiguing sound" which is very important to me. I don't want speakers dictating the kind of music I need to listen to enjoy the experience. If that were true, I would have to throw away a lot of my music . And yes, I get as much detail as I need.