Are mono tube amps my best choice?


I own a Denon 5910 multi disc player as my only source, which I’ve been running into a Burson buffer gain device, and then through two separate passive volume controls. From there I’ve been feeding my four B&K M200 mono amps to my Silverline Grandeur ll speakers. This setup actually sounds pretty nice.

Because my M200s are now over twenty years old, I’m thinking about switching to mono tube amps. I’ve never had tubes in anything I’ve owned. Because my wife and I watch movies (and listen to music), I don’t have space in the middle of the room for a single amp (only 4 inches of height). My stands, passive preamp, and wiring are geared for mono amps.

I live near Sacramento, California, and emailed Min at tubeaudiolab with my room specs and setup to see what he thought would work best. He recommended a pair of mono amps with Kt 88 tubes that produce approximately 60 watts per channel. From the reviews I’ve seen, it appears Min makes some pretty good equipment.

I’m hoping for some Audiogon wisdom to show me the way. Am I making the right choice switching to tube amps? I don’t want to spend more than $2000.
kevine

Showing 5 responses by rodman99999

Even at a sensitivity of 93.5db(2.83V), I wouldn't bother with a 9wpc amp(or pair) for viewing movies with your speakers. There just couldn't be enough bass drive for any realism. You never mentioned what listening levels you enjoy(BTW). Yes- It's true that tube amps seem more powerful than SS, for a given power rating. Whether this is because they clip more gracefully(no square waves or high, odd order distortion), or have more reserve Joules(do to the higher operating voltages)in the power supply, isn't really fully understood. Something you might consider though: Using tubes for your mids/highs, and a pair of your existing amps for the bottom end. You're using two attenuators anyway. Are they stereo? If so- You could try that with Min's SET(though I'd still recommend something around 60wpc).
Kevine: I've been actively bi-amping my home systems since 1980, and most of that time with tubes on the top. Done correctly; the presentation is excellent.
Your speaker system has the efficiency to work well with tubed amps. There is much musical enjoyment to be gained by making the switch to tubes, IF you don't mind the minor added maintenance(personal viewpoint) that tubes require. I'd strongly recommend you audition any amps you are considering, in the system, before making the switch though. The capacitors(and other components) used in some people's designs can produce some very unnatural colorations that may not appeal to your tastes. Just a couple suggestions, based on personal experience with Cary products, their build quality and excellent presentation: (http://www.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?ampstube&1253208656&/Cary/Aes-six-pacs---reduced!-u) (http://www.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?ampstube&1251827291&/Cary-SLM-70-Signature-el34/kt8)
I should have stated, "Done correctly; one can enjoy the speed, definition and dynamics of SS on the bottom and the delicacy, timbre, liquid mids, open sound stage and natural decay of notes that tubes can provide on top."
Kevine- I'm using a pair of modded Cary SLM-100s on top, and a modded TransNova 9505 on the bottom. A modded TacT RCS 2.2X does the crossover and room correction duties. By, "correctly" I mean balancing the levels of the top and bottom, as the power capabilities of your amps would be so different. An active crossover(such as a Dahlquist DQ-LP1 or a Tact) is the best way to success in bi-amping. BUT- You CAN experiment with passive bi-amping via your attenuators. You wouldn't need one on the top(tube amps), but just to bring the level of the SS amps down to match that of the mains(providing the Burson unit has a level control). You want to try tubed monoblocks anyway. While you have everything with which to experiment(when you get the tubed amps); why not give it a try? Bet you like it! =8^)