Are ATC SCM-7's equal to Dynaudio Audience 52's?

I've listened extensively to these speakers with moderately priced ASL tube gear and some decent CD player. They were wonderful. Best cone speakers by far in that price range with excellent detail, treatment of vocals and piano.

They are citical to the front end and material quality. Also very hard to drive with inferior equipment. Best imaging I've ever heard from a small monitor.

The Spendors are also very good, less critical of front end and more managable as far as amplification.

Wait to hear your ATC's. They are a truly great speaker. I'm a musician who has spent years in studios. The ATCs are the best monitor speaker I've heard.

Rather than get a more expensive (but not necessarily better sounding speaker) I think you want to hear them with your NAD. Then if you get the upgrade bug, think about buying a better integrated. Or don't submit to the deadly upgrade virus and just buy more music. If the system is in a small room, you may have hit on a nearly ideal combination.

Seriously, the Dynaudio 1.3se's are very nice. They equal the SCM 7 in some ways but not others. While the Spendors and the Dynaudio 52's will play lower notes in the bass, I don't think they are nearly as accurate as the SCM-7s. ATC makes wonderfully revealing and musical speakers. It is hard to find that combination in any other speaker line. I can say that because I've owned Apogee's, Vandersteen's, Snell's, Watt's, and Sonus Faber as well as ATCs. I've had happy musical moments with each. I don't even own ATCs at present, but I regret I sold mine and will probably get back to them after I pay off my remodel.

Whatever you decide to do, good luck.

Matt

Ecce, ATC SCM 7 strong in Mid , weak in high extention
It requires very high current amplifer to push the bass unit(the bass unit magnetic is even larger than the diameter of the woofer bass unit!) . So i dont think your NAD can drive it well. That why people suggest use Active ACT speaker in some cases.

Personally using Dyna 1.3se with Sim I-5 have good result except power. However , Dyna also need high quality and current to sound their best . I did part my Dyna with a Rotel 1090 amplifier with a poor result.

Spendor may be easily to part with amplifier and have a typical British sound character , which is warm and good image. I think NAD is not bad with Spendor.

i agree with yuenricky in that they are super, super difficult to drive. they, like maggies, open up with lots of *clean* power. the active models are the way to do ATC - not only is the the power supplied, but you get the benefit of an active crossover.

as for the high-extension being weak, i can't say i agree with him, but they *are* using a new tweeter which is better than the last one. perhaps he was more bothered by the previous tweeter. i wasn't, but the new one is clearly better.

if you do decide to go passive, though, you'll be happy. ATC makes what i believe to be the best speaker in the world.