I owned a A100 once and I thought it was a nice amp. Mine had a very slight transformer buzz. I thought it sounded not as full bodied as the NAD 2600A I was using previously. Treble seemed brighter. When I bought the A100 I was told it was a better sounding amp than the A150. The only HK equipment I own presently is a VXi-550 Receiver. It has a very full bodied sound. A pretty decent receiver w/good bass but not that transparent. (What can you expect from a rec.) I suspect going from your HK you'll have a much more transparent sound w/greater clarity. Bass might be as full, but will be more accurate. I'd say give the Acurus a try and see if it works for you. Can't lose too much.
Arcam A-80 thoughts
I am currently using a Harman Kardon HK3380 as my amp. It's phono stage is horrendous, among other issues.
I have listened to the Arcam A65+ and found it to be a pleasant amp, but it's phono stage is still a bit noisy.
Does anybody have any experience with the A80? The associated gear is Acoustic Energy Evo 1 speakers and a Rega P3 turntable with Clearaudio Aurum Alpha wood cartridge.
Cables will probably be Kimber.
I have listened to the Arcam A65+ and found it to be a pleasant amp, but it's phono stage is still a bit noisy.
Does anybody have any experience with the A80? The associated gear is Acoustic Energy Evo 1 speakers and a Rega P3 turntable with Clearaudio Aurum Alpha wood cartridge.
Cables will probably be Kimber.