ARC Reference 110 vs older ARC amps eg VT150


Hi folks

After a number of years running solid state amplification, I recently changed my pre from Krell KRC-HR to the Audio Research LS26, and I'm loving the music it's making. So much so, I'm thinking of replacing my Krell power amp (FPB300) with an ARC.

Logically, the current ARC Reference 110 would be the ideal contender. However, at US$9K, its pretty pricey. A used amp would be much easier on my wallet. How would the slightly older ARC amps, such as the VT150's, VT200's etc compare to the Ref 110?

Thanks in advance for all your input,
kind regards
Mick
mickey_sg

Showing 4 responses by nsgarch

First of all, the VT150/150se (monoblocks) or the VT130/130se (stereo) are in a class by themselves. Both sonically, and among ARC's designs. They have fully balanced circuits, balanced inputs (only,) and tube regulated power supplies. If you can get your hands on a used pair of VT150se ($16k/pr in '94), you'll be very happy! I'd suggest you check their S/N w/ ARC to find out if they have the capacitor upgrade, and if not, order the kit ($200/unit)

Read more: http://www.arcdb.ws/VT150/VT150.html
.
The specs are the same for either. The main difference is convenience (and, let's face it, cosmetic ;-) The SE versions (applies to the 130SE also) make bias-checking much easier (a good thing because you'll do it more often) and all cords and cables are from the rear panel.

The cap upgrade is well worth it for smoother highs and mids.
.
Mick, there are two, beautiful VT130SE's for sale here, both for $3700. I'd buy the one in Pasadena, because it will probably cost less to ship.

If you want some other points of view ;-)) search VT130 on the amp and tube forums at Audio Asylum too.
According to some, the VS series was a 'budget' version of the VT series. So if you're on a budget, why not give it a listen?