With this table, you need to replace the stock footers with some decent cones and then mount the cones on top of a constrained layer device ( CLD ).
If building the CLD / shelf from scratch, don't make it so heavy that you defeat the purpose i.e. the added mass will help to couple it to whatever it is that you have the TT and shelf resting on. The idea is to use the constrained layer shelf as both an energy sink for the air-borne vibrations that the TT pick up and transfer through the cones AND at the same time, use it to isolate heavy footfalls / floor-borne energy that might be transferred up into the rack or support device itself.
The key here is to retain a high level of rigidity to support the TT in a level fashion, but at the same time, make the constrained layer device less dense so as to be self-damping i.e. an energy sink. By using a thin but rigid layer on top and a softer, less dense layer ( or two ) of material underneath that, one can pretty easily achieve this goal. The more layers that you use, and the more dis-similar the materials, the greater the efficiency of the CLD.
Other than that, this table / arm works best with a low mass, higher complaince cartridge. As far as sound goes, the Shure will sound "beefier" but less articulate and far less "nimble" as compared to the Ortofon. Personally, i would consider the Ortofon to be a superior cartridge when properly loaded, but that is obviously a matter of personal preference and arm / table compatability.
In terms of phono stages, i have no idea what you are currently running as far as preamps go. You might be better off investing in a good but used "one box" preamp with a well designed phono stage instead of using an outboard yet mediocre phono stage. For what a decent phono stage costs, you can buy an even better preamp. Sean
>
If building the CLD / shelf from scratch, don't make it so heavy that you defeat the purpose i.e. the added mass will help to couple it to whatever it is that you have the TT and shelf resting on. The idea is to use the constrained layer shelf as both an energy sink for the air-borne vibrations that the TT pick up and transfer through the cones AND at the same time, use it to isolate heavy footfalls / floor-borne energy that might be transferred up into the rack or support device itself.
The key here is to retain a high level of rigidity to support the TT in a level fashion, but at the same time, make the constrained layer device less dense so as to be self-damping i.e. an energy sink. By using a thin but rigid layer on top and a softer, less dense layer ( or two ) of material underneath that, one can pretty easily achieve this goal. The more layers that you use, and the more dis-similar the materials, the greater the efficiency of the CLD.
Other than that, this table / arm works best with a low mass, higher complaince cartridge. As far as sound goes, the Shure will sound "beefier" but less articulate and far less "nimble" as compared to the Ortofon. Personally, i would consider the Ortofon to be a superior cartridge when properly loaded, but that is obviously a matter of personal preference and arm / table compatability.
In terms of phono stages, i have no idea what you are currently running as far as preamps go. You might be better off investing in a good but used "one box" preamp with a well designed phono stage instead of using an outboard yet mediocre phono stage. For what a decent phono stage costs, you can buy an even better preamp. Sean
>