Apple Lossless Encoder - Audiophile Quality?


Is Apple Lossless Encoder the best format to use to import music into iTunes?

My goal is to get the highest quality music regardless of cost.

I want to get the best that I can get of a CD so that I won't have to re-import my music from the same CDs in 5-years.

I am using a Mac based system, but I don't think that should make any difference.
hdomke

Showing 5 responses by rdc2000

Programmers say quite definitively that AL is the EXACT same file when uncompressed as the "true master". If it sounds different to some, it is either in their head or in the way the gear is decoding the file.

And disk space still isn't cheap enough for me!
I'm with the lossless crowd. I just re-ripped from AAC to lossless with hope of never having to do it again.

Believe what the experts say about it being true lossless compression. Those who say not to compress are really coming from the "better safe than sorry" school.

The power and flexibility of itunes is hard to beat, even in a pc environment.
Wdrazek- I haven't backed up yet. Procrastinating as usual. My drive is less than two months old so that's probably driving my complacency. I have to re-format my old drive to back up the files- hence the laziness...

Scrith- thanks for taking that. I couldn't have worded it as well. I'm not sure I agree that you will be tied to Apple hardware/software until the end of time if you go Apple lossless. I run itunes in xp to rip and sonos reads the files. Slim Devices and others also support Apple lossless.

Yes, you have to beware of proprietary formats, but Apple's are becoming so dominant mfr's will be making compatible gear for a long, long time if they want to stay in business. The added perk that you CAN play it in itunes and sync to your ipod and easily share with all the other Apple users out there is not a small deal...
"In the audiophile world where $80,000 speakers are called bargains and people routinely tout $1k power cords I would think the cost of HDs wouldn't be too much of a factor."

Of course there is a lot of truth in that. Those with unlimited budgets can and will spend a lot more than $350 on an HDD. Mid-fiers like me who look for the best sound/quality at the best price always will look at it more critically. I'd rather spend $350 on the best quality drive out there that has enough space to hold my collection for x number of years than a bigger drive that might sound like a rusty wagon wheel within a year..

To me, pc audio is more about bringing true high fidelity sound to the masses than absolute reference quality to the wealthiest audiophiles.

"My legal training tells me that a copy is not the original. It's a copy and whether the copy is indistinguishable from the original is always in question."

Legally, a copy is a copy is a copy whether compressed or not. To me, keeping a virgin copy of the data is keeping the actual cd! And I know most of us are doing that..

I know what you mean about paranoia messing with your head though. When I converted all my files from AAC to AL, itunes asked me each time- "Are you sure you want to replace the old file" I checked yes, watched it convert and then ended up with files 5 times the size. But even though I can easily hear the difference now between these files and MP3 and AAC files on my system, there's that tiny bit of paranoia that they were converted as itunes said they were...