Anyone HEARD the qol 'signal completion' device?

Haven't heard it, but I bet it's just like what Mihalis describes. More crap in the signal path that reduces resolution and transparency.

No thanks.....

Shakey

Unsound makes a good point. Has Doug even heard the device in question?

Shakey

I am wondering why there was no review of the unit in question if Schroeder listened to it extensively in several systems?

Shakey

"Ok Peterayer, I get your point now. Thanks. But lets hope that they don't suddenly start charging $2500 for the wave radios :-)"

That won't happen. But what will happen is these early adopters will kick themselves for buying this thing for 4K when the bottom falls out and it's available for muuuuuch less.

Disclaimer:

Haven't heard it, don't want to.

Shakey

>Audiogon is a place for the free exchange of ideas and information.<

Not really.....

If you want a really good read, take a gander at Jim Merod's QOL review on Positive Feedback. Jim is a guy that, shall we say, likes to "show off". The kind of guy that you might refer to as "really likes to hear himself speak".

Here is a snipet for your amusement:

"So, let me close, temporarily once again, since this explaining stuff and being inclined toward ideas and inspiration, maybe a speculation now and then, is real work cuz ill-considered questions make a guy want to crawl into an ice house on a hot day with a keg of Harp's lager or Boddington's ale along with V. S. Ramachandran's most recent book to ease the tug of imbecilic sophmorisms that music (at the outset) was supposed to dissolve... or confound ahead of time. Jim Merod"

Yeah, that's some good s&*t right there.

Shakey