Any reason to go with anything other than Sanders Magtech for Martin Logan Summit X


Hi All,I know this has all been hashed out before, so please forgive the redundancy, but, in the interest of economy and focus, I'd appreciate anybody to comment on whether or not (and why or why not) I should consider any amp other than the Sanders Sound Systems Magtech for Martin Logan Summit X.
My listening room is about 15 X 25, and I listen to all varieties of music via digital and vinyl sources.

Thanks in advance.
rustler

Showing 2 responses by georgehifi

You might really want a drop in upper octave output, in which case a high output impedance amp (i.e. tube) will suit your needs.
"I inserted impedance above"as this is what will give " a drop in upper octave output " of an esl with tube.

This is correct, if you wish to mute down the top end of an ESL, but I’ve yet to hear an ESL where I want to kill off some top end.
Maybe if the said esl is driven by a "weak tube amp" with no bass grunt, then the top end culling could be in order to balance thing out.

Cheers George
Magtech. 100 percent. The only amp designed to follow the crazy impedance swings and capacitive nature of an electrostatic panel.
Not so true with ML ESL's, do a search on SNA for Summits and the Magtech, it had problems blowing fuses when pushed with their loading, which is quite different and more tricky to the Sander ESL's, they even got a different Magtech from the supplier same thing happened.

Cheers George