Anthem vs. Marantz for Focal speakers


I recently moved to a new home which was prewired for a 5.1 system. I bought a focal flax 5.1 system for 2k. Now I Need an amp or a receiver to complement my speakers. I've been into high end audio for a while but never really ventured into home theater. I know focals can be quite forward with their titanium tweeter, so would like to take that into consideration. I also would like to use these speakers for streaming tidal into 5 channels. I have oppo 205, which could do this very well. I also have a separate preamp (krell KRC3) which I could use to bypass the Receiver/ processor.  I also have an old Mcintosh MX-136 paired with krell 5 channel amp which I'm currently using as a preamp for a separate 5.1 system in basement.

I'm not looking for a reference system. I have a decent stereo system for music in my dedicated listening room. I'm looking for a processor/amp/reciever that would take full advantage of what focals have to offer. I would prefer not to spend more than 2k, new or used. I don't need any latest atmos etc, just a simple 5.1 system. I heard that anthem and marantz are quite capable receivers. Any other ideas? Anthem mrx520 looks decent, how does it sound?
ei001h

Showing 1 response by nagel

I prefer Anthem to Marantz, a little cleaner and hits a little harder I think. Best of all is ARC is better sounding than Audessy. Anthem is brighter and I like that, but keep in mind that you're going to use room correction anyway. That should take care of it unless you plan to listen to 2 channel without correction. In that case, Marantz may well be better if you're concerned about too much treble.
I just upgraded from MRX-710 to 720. A little more power than 520 and has atmos. Good luck! Dan