The 390 is an excellent piece, but the 590 just does everything a bit better. The 390 is the sweet spot, but the 590 is worth it IMO over the 390.
Another Hegel H390 vs H590 Thread
Hey all, I know there have been a number of h390 v h590 posts so sorry for another, but I have what I think is a unique dilemma.
I think the general consensus is that while the 590 is marginally better, it isn’t worth $11,000, or nearly double the price of the 390 and that the 390 is the sweet spot.
I was just about to make the purchase of a 390 for $6K when my dealer offered me a brand new 590 for $8500. Very tempting! What do you guys think? Worth the extra $2500?
(In case it helps the rest of my system is:
Speakers: Duevel Venus (omnis - very inefficient)
TT: EAT C-sharp w/ EAT Jo. 5 cartridge and EAT E-glo petit phono pre
Music server: Innuos Zen Mk III
Int. Amp I’m moving on from: Prima Luna Dialogue HP)
- ...
- 18 posts total
i agree w @geof3 590 subtly but noticeably better sounding than 390 -- if the system is quite resolving that said, the 390 is very very very good sounding, well above its price point (~5 grand) ... only in direct comparison, immediately switching over to the 590 (or an h20) will one hear that the 390 is a touch smoother, duller, less ultimately transparent -- the 590 has more pure, more specific image focus, better retrieval of detail without any added solid state harshness... but the other side of this same coin is that the 390 can be somewhat more forgiving sounding if the particular setup can benefit from this based on source material or rest of the system finally, the 390 has a specific functionality that the slightly earlier-released 590 lacks, and that is the 390 can fully decode/unfold tidal mqa through all its relevant digital inputs, whereas the 590 can do so only over its usb input power wise, pretty much any speaker that one unit will comfortably drive, so will the other (one must have a pretty darn inefficient/reactive speaker load, or huge room, exhaust a 390 where a 590 will hold it together... in my use, the 390 never even remotely breathed hard...) to me, these are the salient differences between the two... the op can determine one his/her own whether the price difference is worth spending in the specific application
|
Thanks all, great input. I appreciate it. I’ve actually managed to arrange an im home demo tomorrow between the 590 and the 390 so we’ll see. @jjss49 thanks for your excellent take! Btw, the MQA decode through only USB has apparently been solved for about a year. The newer 590s with a standby function also will decode MQA through all inputs, just like a 390. (Not that I really care, as a Qobuz user…) |
that is good to know... i sold my 590 over a year ago... did hegel handle this via firmware update so all 590's can gain the added mqa functionality, or are only newer shipped 590's able to do this? |
@jjss49 my understanding is that it is a hardware implementation in the 590 from late 2020. They came out with a new version that had power standby as well as MQA on all inputs: Direct quote from a Hegel employee on the hegel Facebook page: “MQA is a hardware feature, so this has nothing to do with firmware upgrades. H590 with standby has the same DAC implementation as H390 with MQA on all inputs.” |
- 18 posts total