Analog vs. digital


I’ve found that on my system the digital side is more finely etched than the analog side. Both sound great in their own way, but records just don’t sound so finely defined.
What is your experience?

rvpiano

Showing 1 response by theaudioamp

@blisshifi I use HDR all the time in nature photography. Almost always the result is positive with a much more natural look. Realistically with 13-14 stops on modern digital simple tone mapping is already enough. When you use HDR to naturally extend dynamic range you provide a more natural image which the brain interprets as natural. Natural shadow detail does not fatigue the brain. When people use unnatural HDR for artistic effect, that is fatiguing. 

 

On TVs in store, that's not HDR, that is high contrast and saturation at artificial levels. HDR in TVs is good. Enhanced shadow detail.