@richopp I tried at least three different models of ARC preamp. Those ARC tend to have more resolution than the Mc Preamp, but always sounds thin and bass-shied ... Overall, ARC is more hi-fi than Mc, but will drive me out of the room sooner or later due to boredom.
Ampzilla 2000 v2 and Mcintosh MC402
I have the opportunity to either purchase an Ampzilla 2000 or MC402 from Mcintosh. I am choosing either one of these and would like your opinion on either one. Which one is better sound quality wise?
The rest of my system is : Mcintosh C1100 preamp, KEF reference 1 speakers, and Audioquest cables.
I like deep big bass, smooth mid range, big and deep sound stage and airy high.
Showing 13 responses by viethluu
@jasonbourne52 They are still in business under SST. I just spoke to the owner yesterday. In fact, I am purchasing the 2000 directly from the company. |
@jallan I am serious. Ampzilla is a good American company made in central California. Mcintosh is an equality good one as well. |
@jasonbourne52 That is a good piece of history. My only concern is: since Jame is gone, the company might stop innovating. It will begin to fall behind its competitor (for example: Mcintosh). I am current having appointments for both Mc402 and Ampzilla 2000. I have until this Friday to cancel one of them! |
@jasonbourne52 No way in hell that I will sell the Mc Preamp. In my opinion, Mc makes some very good preamp. I compared it with a lot of other preamps and always come back to the Mc preamp. I cannot say the same with Mc power amp though. |
@ghasley I actually seriously considering a new Pass Labs amp. My borrowed x150.5 sound great with my Mcintosh C1100 preamp (even better than the MC352 itself). I am exploring the option of having a new x250.8 as my next amp. |
@richopp Do not get me wrong though. I ranked ARC Pre as second best after Mcintosh Preamp. The thinness makes them falls a little behind the Mc |
@keithr too bad, I just cancelled my ampzilla order yesterday. I might go with pass labs based on every one recommendation. |