Amps In Wall Or Conditioner?


Stereo amp and subwoofer amp, both with upgrade PCs, plugged straight into (upgraded) wall outlets.
Same with tube preamp.

Now getting power conditioner for use on DAC, streamers, CD, maybe even analog sources. 
Conditioner has 2 high-current outlets. Majority opinion says don't use these for amps.
If not, how about preamp and/or DAC? Any foreseeable benefit or detriment of high-current vs. linear filtered?
Thanks! 
hickamore

Showing 2 responses by turnbowm

"Love the Niagara 1200 paired with an AudioQuest Tornado power cord. Compared it to a Puritan 156, and sold the Puritan."

The Puritan has a series inductor in the AC supply to every outlet and can, under certain conditions such as dynamic (changing) current demands of Class A/B power amps, result in "current-starving" with a loss of dynamics and bass impact. Simply put, inductors oppose changes in current flow. Audioquest avoids this problem in the Niagra 1200 by using NO filters in the high-current (HC) outlets.
"No current starving on ANY amp I put on the Puritan. Puritan advertises the same thing. I have put a 400 watt class A/B amp on it. A 55 watt pure class A amp on it……you get the idea. Always sounded better than plugging into my upgraded audiophile wall outlet as part of a dedicated 20 amp circuit isolated from the rest of the home’s electrical. That is my experience in my home..."

I have every reason to believe that your experience is as described. Class A amps have a relatively constant current demand, so a series inductor in the AC feed does not pose a problem. The same holds true for a heavily-biased Class A/B amp such as your Coda which runs Class A for the first 20 watts if moderate SPL is in play.

The series inductor becomes a problem, however, when a lightly-biased Class A/B amp is driven at high levels. A loss in dynamics and bass impact will result and may be what tvad experienced. This is the very reason why Audioquest and Furman use energy-storage technology in their pricier power conditioners.