Amir and Blind Testing


Let me start by saying I like watching Amir from ASR, so please let’s not get harsh or the thread will be deleted. Many times, Amir has noted that when we’re inserting a new component in our system, our brains go into (to paraphrase) “analytical mode” and we start hearing imaginary improvements. He has reiterated this many times, saying that when he switched to an expensive cable he heard improvements, but when he switched back to the cheap one, he also heard improvements because the brain switches from “music enjoyment mode” to “analytical mode.” Following this logic, which I agree with, wouldn’t blind testing, or any A/B testing be compromised because our brains are always in analytical mode and therefore feeding us inaccurate data? Seems to me you need to relax for a few hours at least and listen to a variety of music before your brain can accurately assess whether something is an actual improvement.  Perhaps A/B testing is a strawman argument, because the human brain is not a spectrum analyzer.  We are too affected by our biases to come up with any valid data.  Maybe. 

chayro

Showing 1 response by pinthrift

Objective measured findings vs Subjective, time-tested listening help fuel our hobby, often with much howling.  Thanks, chayro, in requesting calm on this topic.

As an over-ripened audio guy, I plead guilty to "expected" changes in adding, replacing or removing gear, plus burn-in factors.  I've done a ton of A / B comparisons, including assisting cable manufacturer evals, both in-house and in my rooms.  Despite this seasoning, there are always unexpected twists and turns.  TIDAL updates, for example, can change streaming quality settings, without notice.  

There is certainly a place for the Amirs in our hobby.  This is the balance.  We each possess the most refined listening tools created, however.  "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."  Trust, and utilize laser rulers.

More Peace, Pin