@larryrs- "....hyperbolic"? What was it, that Hirsch, "relied on", besides measurements? His other, "reference"? OH, YEAH: "sounds". Once again(from his pen): " I’ve never listened to live music, but- I have a pretty good idea what it sounds like." That was the most inane statement, that I’d ever read, by a purported, "reviewer" of audio equipment AND; remains so, to this day. I determined Hirsch(and the rag), to be of no further value to me, based on a couple decades(at that time) of a life, focused on the production and reproduction of live music and never read another issue. That was the exercising of a prerogative, based on a personal opinion. FACT: All music is sound, but- not all sounds are an accurate reproduction of recorded music, though some will settle for(or- absolutely love) such, like he(invariably) did. Your initial post and the review you copy/pasted, concluded that, " In summation.........The choice then becomes a matter of taste.", after comparing a speaker system’s performance, to nothing beyond the performance/sound of other speakers and listener opinions. If that’s a metric, to which you ascribe value, enjoy!
All the old issues of Stereo Review are online!!
And available here:
https://www.americanradiohistory.com/HiFI-Stereo-Review.htm
The infamous Clark amplifier test is January, 1987, if anyone wants to re-live that. I remember reading that when it came out (I was just out of college, but, having worked at an audio shop when I was 14, was already well into the hobby). That was when I began to be aware of how I might be suckered by appearances.
Lots of things to love or hate, but oh, the advertisements!
The infamous Clark amplifier test is January, 1987, if anyone wants to re-live that. I remember reading that when it came out (I was just out of college, but, having worked at an audio shop when I was 14, was already well into the hobby). That was when I began to be aware of how I might be suckered by appearances.
Lots of things to love or hate, but oh, the advertisements!