Alignment of SME 309 vs. Shure protractor


I recently bought a Shure M97xE for a bedroom turntable, but out of curiosity laid the supplied protractor on my VPI, which has an SME 309 arm that was properly aligned with the SME protractor (that came with the arm).

The Shure protractor is the typical two point alignment type, while the SME is specific for the 309 arm, and contains one point to place the stylus and then an outline of the arm which the arm itself should fit into if viewed from above.

The Shure shows very different results than the SME. The Shure version would suggest that my arm is mounted way to close to the platter. Anyone have an idea as to how the two could be so different?
opalchip

Showing 1 response by jameswei

This is hard to address without more information. My first guess is that the Shure could be right because it uses a two point (the two null points in the stylus' arc) system that allows you to triangulate to find the location of the tonearm pivot, versus the SME which has only one point (and presumably assumes the correct pivot location).

I note that the SME 309 typically comes mounted on a "sled" sliding device that permits adjustment of the key tonearm pivot-to-platter spindle distance. Perhaps your arm is out of adjustment.

The SME web site is: http://www.sme.ltd.uk/html/series300.html
This web page identifies the correct pivot-to-spindle (center of spindle) distance as 213.4 millimeters for the 309. If you think the distance may be set incorrectly, I would urge you to measure it and see if it is close to this number. If not, it is likely you can adjust it using the "sled" apparatus. Good luck.