Alert, Warning, and Caution about Modified Components


This information has previously been provided to the group under a previous, pre-existing  thread and is beyond dispute, argumentation, or refutation however the thread was deleted because of improper, abusive, antagonistic behavior by one of the participants which while it was a correct, justified, and measured response by the moderators it had the unfortunate, unintended, unnecessary consequence, result, and effect of removing this information that will be of value to some although of course many of the knowledgeable experts here will already know this.

There are some dealers who sell new equipment that they have modified, altered, or customized by some method, fashion, or design and I am not talking hear about professionals who are often degreed engineers who are fully educated, skilled, and qualified to make such alterations to components intended for use in a Music Reproduction System. I am talking about dealers some of which are actually "part time" as can be shown by they're store hours and these retailers, merchandisers, and salesman do not have the prerequisite qualifications to perform this type of work. Without expressing any opinion, judgement, or assessment of these "modifications" I offer to the group these agreed upon details of which those considering such action should be consciuous:

1.) Any modification of an electrical component carries with it a potential hazard of fire and/or electrical shock and as such can be lethal and this risk should be considered against the potential value of any "improvement" promised as a result of the modification.

2.) Any modification is certain to render invalid, void, and unenforceable any manufacturer's guarantee, warrantee, promise, or assurance regarding safety, reliability, and performance of the equipment subjected to the alteration. 

3.) Because of as stated in item 2 above, the manufacturer of such modified equipment is certain to decline, refuse, and reject any request to service, repair, or even inspect such a unit that has been altered contrary to or in in conflict or defiance of it's original design.

4.) Because the altered unit is now something unique unto itself and familiar only with the person who did the modification it is likely if not certain that no one will be willing to service or repair the unit other than the modifyer himself which as we know may be fully unqualified to perform any such work.

5.) You should also be cynical, suspicous and doubtful of anyone who asserts, insists, or represents in any way that his modified component is superior in performance, specification, or result from a factory original unit which has been fully tested and verified before even entering into production.


I will add to these facts that those who are unqualified to make such expensive modifications refuse to provide specific information, detail, and explanation of the work that they perform while those who are expert, qualified, and capable to do such work will explain the exact work that they perform.

This thread is limited, restricted, and reserved for discussion of equipment component modification and off topic response will be reported to the appropriate Audiogon authorities for deletion.
clearthink

Showing 12 responses by glupson

geoffkait,

Politely asking for answers about some unusually strong and fairly unclear claims is not striking anybody with anything. It is usually called "civilized discussion". Maybe Wikipedia has something about that so you may learn, too.
bo1972,

"When you have done thousands of test in over 20 years of time, you know what is possible and what is not."
No doubt that there are patterns in everything. However, implying foolishness in someone who has actually done something, while you watch the pictures, seems a bit odd. A little restraint may be much wiser approach.

If it is so predictable from pictures, why did you need thousands of tests and a couple of decades to get it right? Maybe, if you have another decade to spare, you would find out that some of those pictures were right. Maybe they are simply a decade ahead of you.
bo1972,

Your last few sentences...

"You only can use the word High-End when..."

"People like to be fooled..."

May be reconsidered after reading what you joined this thread with...

"Everyone has the right to have his own opinion, even clearthink."

bo1972,

"The photos show how little they all know. They have no idea what they do wrong, due to the fact that they never tested it."
How do you know it is wrong? How do you know how it sounds based on the picture? The person who placed it on that picture actually tested it and is likely even using it. You only saw the picture. There is something wrong with that approach.
"The photos of all systems on Facebook and the internet show the same limitations over and over again."
Can you give us an example or two, actually three would be the best for this thread, of audio limitations you see on the Facebook? That statement is confusing.
"No, I don’t want to come over and see how good your unmodified, untreated system sounds."
Partybreaker, spoilsport, killjoy.
doubleblindtest,

You should change into tripleblindtest to join this party.
I apologize, but I had an urge, habit, or addiction to write, post, or submit three writings, posts, or submissions in the row.

I am starting to understand clearthink. Give him, me, or us a break, please.
"His first paragraph in the original post was one huge run-on sentence!"
He missed making, writing, or designing it into three paragraphs/sentences/expressions.
dekay,

"I cut my nose on a CD 5 days ago...……..The Sharp unit is completely stock "
Never get too close to anything Sharp.
What kind of writing, expression, or question is this?

"Don't you agree, clearthink?"

Don't you agree, admit, and concur that you made a mistake, error, and fault millercarbon, millercarbon, millercarbon?