I "inherited" a 5800 from my Father's system. Quite honestly, i thought it sounded so bad in his system that i gave him another better / more expensive amp in exchange for it just to get it out of there. I ended up selling the 5800 for a noticeable loss compared to what was invested in the other amp, but that was pretty much expected. Such is the cost of being "a good son" : )
Before selling it, i did hook it up and listen to it for a few days. I obtained pretty much the same results at my house that we heard at my Father's. The bass was bloated and indistinct, there was a complete lack of soundstage, imaging, air, etc... treble was somewhat hard sounding, etc... As the drive level was increased, the amp became even less cohesive. EVERYTHING was kind of jumbled together and the treble developed a very noticeable glare and grain.
In terms of construction, the amp is pretty well built and uses two fans for forced cooling. They are thermostatically controlled, so you won't hear them running. They only come on when "gettin' it", so the volume from the speakers easily covers up the noise. Outside of the sonics, the other sore spot that this amp has is the power switch. You can pretty much count on it breaking. I've replaced a couple of them for other locals that have these amps. Not a big deal, but something to keep in mind. For the money, they do give you a pretty reasonable amount of muscle. Unfortunately, it is "raw" muscle with no finesse involved.
While i haven't heard the 5802, it is SUPPOSEDLY how the 5800 was supposed to sound and be built to start off with. Instead of calling it a 5800 Mk II, it just became the 5802. From those that i've spoken to, the general consensus is that it is a MUCH better amp in every respect. Whether or not it is a good match for your system is the bottom line though. Sean
>
Before selling it, i did hook it up and listen to it for a few days. I obtained pretty much the same results at my house that we heard at my Father's. The bass was bloated and indistinct, there was a complete lack of soundstage, imaging, air, etc... treble was somewhat hard sounding, etc... As the drive level was increased, the amp became even less cohesive. EVERYTHING was kind of jumbled together and the treble developed a very noticeable glare and grain.
In terms of construction, the amp is pretty well built and uses two fans for forced cooling. They are thermostatically controlled, so you won't hear them running. They only come on when "gettin' it", so the volume from the speakers easily covers up the noise. Outside of the sonics, the other sore spot that this amp has is the power switch. You can pretty much count on it breaking. I've replaced a couple of them for other locals that have these amps. Not a big deal, but something to keep in mind. For the money, they do give you a pretty reasonable amount of muscle. Unfortunately, it is "raw" muscle with no finesse involved.
While i haven't heard the 5802, it is SUPPOSEDLY how the 5800 was supposed to sound and be built to start off with. Instead of calling it a 5800 Mk II, it just became the 5802. From those that i've spoken to, the general consensus is that it is a MUCH better amp in every respect. Whether or not it is a good match for your system is the bottom line though. Sean
>