Advice on....Snake Oil


So, I get it. You purchase something and other claim it's snake oil. Or they purchase snake oil and you lay claim to the adage. 

My one question,

What is the general consensus a reputable brand would spend considerable time, resources and finances to create a product that is or what some would call "snake oil". 

My belief is that a lot of brands (PS Audio, Isoacoustics, Audioquest) would probably better spend their time developing and creating an impact rather than making a questionable product. Any dialogue to be had or am I off base?
128x128j-wall

Showing 1 response by mitch2

In the absence of agreed upon measurable criteria, the value of an item becomes subjective to the emotions elicited in the buyer.  IME, most audio equipment manufacturers believe in their product lines.   A $300 fuse may be "snake oil" to some while to others it may be the final touch to achieving great sound in their home.  

Your last paragraph seems to assume "a lot of brands" have purposely chosen to avoid "developing and creating an impact" and instead have chosen to make "a questionable product."  I am curious what you consider "a questionable product" and why you believe those brands would be "better" if they adopted a more altruistic goal of "creating an impact."

Yes, I believe you are off base.  IME, most audio equipment manufacturers are simply trying to stay afloat in a business they are passionate about.