@Moffimadness and @Swapmwalker,
It came down to the Sonographe and the Mccormack. I found the Sonographe in the Audiogon classifieds for about 200 less than the Mccormack. It was a matter of dollars and sense so I jumped on the SA 250 while I could.
I picked up an Adcom gfa 450 used for a little over a hundred, received both packages yesterday, and have been listening to the new combination since. I'm incredibly happy with my purchase. I still have to dial in everything, but my first impressions are very good. This is a day/night before/after change and I'm still trying to pick out the differences. The first thing I noticed was the clarity. My receiver was anemic compared to the sonograph, but comparing a well designed CJ to, essentially, a boombox is hardly a fair comparison.
Long story short, I'm quite happy and very satisfied. Thank you very much for your help!
I'll likely slink back here in a few months when I'm ready to upgrade to a nicer pre.
Thanks Again.
It came down to the Sonographe and the Mccormack. I found the Sonographe in the Audiogon classifieds for about 200 less than the Mccormack. It was a matter of dollars and sense so I jumped on the SA 250 while I could.
I picked up an Adcom gfa 450 used for a little over a hundred, received both packages yesterday, and have been listening to the new combination since. I'm incredibly happy with my purchase. I still have to dial in everything, but my first impressions are very good. This is a day/night before/after change and I'm still trying to pick out the differences. The first thing I noticed was the clarity. My receiver was anemic compared to the sonograph, but comparing a well designed CJ to, essentially, a boombox is hardly a fair comparison.
Long story short, I'm quite happy and very satisfied. Thank you very much for your help!
I'll likely slink back here in a few months when I'm ready to upgrade to a nicer pre.
Thanks Again.