Adcom Amps & Pres


Is there anyone else out there that thinks that Adcom amps offer quite a bit of bang for the buck? I alternate driving my Maggie MG IIIs with a pair of 565 monoblocks, or the newer MOSFET 5802 both of which I picked up quite reasonably.I never seem to run out of currant and I'm a SPL junkie and am pretty happy both ways. I also alternate between the 565 and 750 Pres. (definate edge to the 750) Don't see much in the way of feedback on this Companies products??? I've auditioned the Big boys in compairison and am left wondering how much better they really sound givin the gargaintioun price differance. BTW Jazz is my game. Thanx
flynntom

Showing 3 responses by flynntom

That very Anthony H. Cordesman review actually launched ME To my dealer for my first of several 555s. I've been a devoted follower since. Can't say I've been impressed with their processors but hey, even Sara Lee bakes a crappy cake now and then. One thing I learned a long time ago is that nobody does EVERYTHING right. The newer MOSFET designs are smoother and more polite, while the older gear like the 555s and the 565 had more slam! Either way, they make my Maggies sing and never let me down when I demand the juice!!
Well said Danielk141!!! IMHO It'll STOMP a few others selling at twice its price. Same goes for the 5802. To say nothing of a couple of excellent Pres. Some like to point to a few well known QC glitches that have occured over the years as justification for their poor regard, but truth be told and all records exposed, some of the most highly regarded names out there have had more then their share of same. Lets face it, it's always been in vogue to beat up on the underdog. I think it would be interesting to know how many folks who could EASILY afford those are perfectly happy hanging on to these fine examples of FAIRLY PRICED GEAR.
Thanks for the responses! I'm also curious as to how others feel about the sound of the newer MOSFET Adcom amps versis their older powerplants such as the 565 mono blocks?