Active or passive preamps?


If passive preamps add nothing , then it should be the purist to the origianl signal, so why audiophiles want active preamps? And then is it true that all the passive preamp are created equal? Thx.
kitty

Showing 2 responses by tom_nice

John_1 is certainly right that not all passives are equal. Not only parts quality but the choice of attenuator matters. Most agree that stepped attenuators based on rotary switches are superior to potentiometers--though makers and users of very expensive pots will disagree. But assuming stepped is best, it can be series, shunt or ladder configuration. I see no excuse except money-saving for series, though some very prestigious active preamps--the CAT's, for example--use them. The switch matters too. Elma is good, but Shallco is impossible to beat in my experience. A DIY passive can compete with the best commercial ones available, and if you don't use more than two sources, it can be quite simple. But as others have said, your sources have to be up to driving a passive. However, if they aren't, why not aim for ones that are? The money you save not buying an active preamp should make this a practical option.
One source for DIY passive preamps is www.goldpt.com. Arne Roatcap has designed Elma switches with circuit boards, in various configurations, and has at least one schematic for a passive. He's a helpful source of advice too. If you want info from me on what I've built, email nicetom@sonic.net. I used Elma switches once, Shallco several times, from either The Parts Connection or directly from Shallco.