About Koetsu Rosewood


Hello,

I was given some days ago a Koetsu rosewood cartridge for a test run

in view to buy it for some 1500 usd.

It was the first time that I could hear such an expensive and highly regarded cartridge.

My system is Marantz sc-9 premp (with its very good mc and mm phono inputs) and Marantz sm-9 amplifier. The TT is a Sony TTS-2510.  (I like vintage)

 

I have also a Phasemation ea-200  phono unit which is very good.  And my LS are Cabasse Brigantin 372 (very very good ls which I am very fond of)

I could compare this Koetsu cartridge with some very good (but  much less expensive) cartridges in my collection such as (MC) sony xl-44L, at33ml, victor mc-1, and (MM)  Pioneer PC-600 and Victor X-1E.

Well, what can I say. I liked Koetsu very much. It is an excellent cartridge indeed. Even it can be called perfect sounding cartridge. I noticed well the difference between Koetsu and the other cartridges.

But all that said, I decided not to buy it. Because I did not find that with Koetsu my system would sound so much better. The test (for me) showed not that Koetsu was much better than the others, but than the others were if not equal (of course not) at least also very good and so much less expensive. In that sense the test was in their favour. I prefer to spent money on records J)

That is what I think.

 

Now, I took the photo of the Koetsu needle, and I would like to ask if it is an original needle or retipped but I did not find how to attach a photo to the message ;((( Could anybody tell me ?

 

Thank you very much

 

Serge

serge8

Showing 1 response by elliottbnewcombjr

serge8

Luckily you were able to hear/know it’s sound compared to your existing cartridges. IF it had sounded superior, obviously superior, no doubt you would have bought it. That leaves you wanting confirmation the stylus is indeed good and you heard the best it could do, thus the photo, correct?

I would say, if you didn’t hear any problem, and it sounded darn good, you have heard the best it can be in your system, and you got confirmation of your prior choices.

////////////////////////

to post a photo:

1. On my computer, I selected a random photo’s icon, (Valentin’s Blue Spring Flower). I right clicked, chose copy, got the blinking insert going in this post window here, chose paste, it worked!

OH, indeed, the photo appeared until I posted, at which time it disappeared, proceed to 2 below

2. sometimes that doesn’t work, you need to get the photo online first.

either find one, or, upload your photo online anywhere. I created a Virtual System here called MISC, and I upload random pics to it. Once online, you do this:

a. open the photo, right click, ’copy image address’

b. an active post window, top bar, 6th icon from the left is ’image’, click, a window opens, waiting for you to paste the url (image address) into it

c. width: enter 555 in the width so it will fit undistorted (no need to enter height)

d. ok

e. press return, that way you can add comments below the photo now or if/when you edit

here’s Lawerence’s Bird Photo