A Suggestion Regarding Removal Of Posts

My suggestion is that Christopher Walken moderate the forums and instead of the offending posts being removed they would remain with digital lines drawn through the words.

Chris would then attach a short video (to the post) with him explaining why the post wasn't up to snuff.

Being that he's an interesting guy - he might just go for it.

Of course - I'm open to other suggestions as well.

DeKay

uncledemp:

That's assured, but I would like to think that he/she/they keep a "diary" of the deleted posts that really made their day.

DeKay

czarivey:

"I recommend against that, because if it happens, @onhwy61 will lose his nose obviously first."

Huh?

61 has been here since when I first started posting (the year 2000) and the "A'Gon start dates" linked to many of our monikers are inaccurate (something to do with a system overhaul years ago).

Always enjoyed 61's input and from memory he seems to be more even keeled than many, many, many, many, many here (defintely including myself).

However, if the OP were to be granted "power" over their thread(s), as 61 suggested, I assume that 50-75% of my posts would not make the grade.

So,...

this is a BIG NO to me (plus it would enable the misinformation/shill posters). 

I made a suggestion/solution in regard to the OP's query, as have others.

What has been your contribution to this thread, aside from attacking the OP?

DeKay 

Odd:

I've always gathered that "cancel culture" is tuned to popular opinion/voice/vote.

What's wrong with that?

Maybe I'm wrong on this, but I did once petition to keep a certain businesses out of my small city and they never opened up shop here (same end with other small cities within a 12 mile radius as to the very same company/corp).

DeKay