A few more Ohm questions


There seems to be a bunch of knowledegeable Ohm types here. Since their web set ain't great, maybe you folks know:

The models are purportedly designed to sound similar - i.e., as you move up their product line, you get the same sound in a bigger room. How do the models differ? Is the same driver used in a different cabinet to alter bass response or do the different models use different drivers.

Also, if the main difference is room compatability then I'd assume that the differences from model to model focus mostly (though evidently not exclusively) on bass balance, how do the Ohm satellite/sub models differ? There is a satellite model equivalent for each full range model in the line, but all the sats are designed for use above 80 hz only. As far as bass balance goes, i would think the bass cut off would reduce the need for model differentiation that focuses on bass balance.

Do the different models become more directional in dispersion at different frequencies or at different rates to account for boundary differences that are likely to be found in different sized rooms? I suspect that speakers in small rooms are usually - though not always - closer to boundaries. Is this the basis for model differentiation?

The Micro Talls have a listed response down to 47hz. For full range operation, a sub is recommended (particularly for theater use, but optionally for music use, all per the website). How does the Micro Tall w/ a sub compare to the sat/sub combos they offer?

Following the very positive Ohm threads here has piqued my curiosity and the line certainly provides a more cost effective omni option than MBL or even Duevel. OTOH, I find the product line info on the web site awfully confusing.

These questions arose after a brief conversation with John - who was very helpful - and I'd rather see if I can get answers here before I bug him again.

Thanks in advance.

Marty
martykl

Showing 1 response by biz97

Marty,

I can try to answer a few of your questions:

1) The Ohm sound does indeed sound very similar from model to model. I went from the Micro to the 100 and the difference was room fill. The sound and detail level was the same but they fill my room better. They also play louder obviously. Each model user a larger driver from the previous model I believe. The cabinet is also larger. At least this is the case with going from the Micro to the 100s
2) Even though the lower bass would be off-loaded to a Sub in the HT models, you would still want a larger driver to handle different SPL requirements. If you have a huge room, larger speakers will have an easier time getting to louder sound levels than smaller ones.
3) The Main Ohm's are crossed over to a super tweeter that is directional at the higher frequencies. In my experience the transition is very smooth. I believe they offer true omni's that are designed for use as surrounds.
4) I have used the Mirco's /w a sub in a music only system. This would give you more flexibility in where to set the crossover. 80Hz might be fine for some, but others may choose to cross over a bit lower depending on the application. In my setup, I did not have bass management so the extra bass from the Micros allowed me to cross the sub at a lower level to get a smoother transition.
5) I would recommend e-mailing or giving John a call. He is a great guy and my experiences have been very positive. If you have special needs they can work with you to tweak a model to your needs. Combine that with the great warranty and long audition period and they are definitely something to keep in mind. Someone can chime in and correct or add to anything I may have said but I hope this helps :)