2.5 or 3 way; why one over the other?


So, in my research, I see several well regarded Manufacturers making both 2.5 and 3 way speaker systems in the same product series.  Often they are close in height (floorstanders) and footprint and presumably use comparable quality components.  Please help me understand the pro's and con's as to why one would choose one over the other.
larstusor

Showing 1 response by audiokinesis

Different approaches for different goals. Let's assume we're comparing at the same price point so that it's apples-to-apples in that respect at least. 

2.5 way will typically move more air (play louder and/or have better bass) because more of your money is going into woofers, and you have two motors active down low where you need them the most.

3-way will typically have better mids because a dedicated midrange driver can usually do a better job on the mids than a midwoofer can, and may result in a better transition to the tweeter in the crossover region. 

This is an over-generalization of course.  There are exceptions and the exceptions can be quite interesting.  A single low-bass-only woofer that is relieved of midrange duty may go deeper than two midwoofers.  Or perhaps a midwoofer is a better match for a particular tweeter than a smaller dedicated midrange driver would be. 

If there was a clear "best" format, everyone would be using it.  But instead it's a juggling of tradeoffs.  I don't use either one, unless you consider satellites + subs to be a 3-way. 

Duke