10 Audio Cable Myths and Facts



In a sea of audio cable industry snake oil, we’re sure you’re wondering, What really matters when buying cables?Save your money by avoiding overpriced cables with outlandish claims. Below are some common myths to look out for and some important things to consider when buying audio cables.
 
CABLE MYTHS1. Conductor skin effect

In some applications like power transmission lines, an electric signal tends to travel through the surface of a conductor and avoids traveling through the center of the conductor. Many cable companies claim that their design limits the skin effect and measurably improves your sound.

The TruthWhile skin effect is a very real issue for large scale power transmission, audio signals are in such a low-frequency range that the skin effect is negligible at best. The skin effect is only an issue in high-frequency applications. 20kHz is the highest frequency that humans can hear. If we calculate the skin effect on a 12 AWG speaker cable like Gene from Audioholics does in this article, we find that the skin effect results in a loss of only -.014dB. Your speakers, room acoustics, and the human ear have a much larger effect on your sound than the skin effect.
2. Cable break-in

Don’t be fooled - any company that claims this thinks they can trick you into hearing better sound after a month or two. “Break-in” is a commonly used term throughout the industry. It is the idea that the dielectric of a cable changes and aligns itself to the electromagnetic field of the signal traveling through the conductors.

The Truth

There is no scientific evidence to support the idea of cable break-in, but there are still those who claim it improves sonic qualities. We’re not against optimism. We’re just not full of crap. Don’t drink the audio industry kool-aid and save your money for legitimate cables.
 

3. Cryogenic treatment

Cryogenic treatment is the process of freezing cables to -320 degrees Fahrenheit before use. The claim is that freezing the conductors of the cable at ultra low temperatures aligns the crystalline grain structure of them resulting in desirable improvements.

The Truth

Again there is no scientific data to support this notion. Cryogenic treatment can improve the durability of certain metals, usually steel, by stabilizing impurities. For example, the process is used to create strong tools or car parts.  

But, steel is a terrible metal to use for audio cables. It is one of the least conductive metals out there! Copper and silver are the best conductors of electricity and the preferred metals for audio cables.


4. Cable signal direction

You might hear this phrase tossed around quite a bit. It’s the notion that a cable has an established signal direction, the direction in which it was initially used, and that this signal direction should not be reversed.

The Truth

The reality is, assuming the connector ends and terminals are the same, the cable will work in both directions and the performance will be equivalent.

5. Cable elevators, risers, or lifts

 

The claim is that the cables’ magnetic field can interfere with the surface it is laying on. Essentially, the magnetic field can “reflect” from the surface back into the cable and cause distortions.

 

The Truth

There is no evidence to support these claims, and these unnecessary devices are merely for looks. They are in no way proven to improve cable performance.  

    CABLE FACTS1. Shielding is Important

    In the modern age, wireless signals are all around us all the time. The rapid growth and spread of technology means that these wireless signals will become more widespread and more likely to cause unwanted interference. Cellphones, wifi, and Bluetooth signals can enter your cables, but shielding can block these signals and preserve your sound quality.

    2. Length is a Factor

    No matter how well a cable is designed, cable length will always impact performance. As the length of a cable goes up, so does the risk of unwanted interference and signal loss. We always recommend keeping your cables as short as possible, but we understand that is not always possible. A well constructed and shielded cable will help combat this issue.

      3. Conductor material plays a role

      The best conductors to use for audio cables are pure silver or pure copper. Both are valued for their high conductivity, but copper is more widely used due to the high price of silver. Additionally, some variations are constructed with silver-plated copper. However, because the metals have different conductivities, the sound is more likely to travel through only the silver plating and not the copper.

      The purity of the conductor will affect performance more than anything. Look for Oxygen-Free High Conductivity (OFHC) conductors. This means that a significant percentage of oxygen and other impurities have been removed from the conductor resulting in high purity.  

      4. Wire gauge should not be overlooked

      The amount of wattage your system is using will determine the total gauge size needed for safe and optimal performance. The standard is 14 gauge wire minimum for the transmission of 250 watts of power. Many electronic devices use much less than this, but some speakers and listening setups may be using more. If your system uses more than 250 Watts, we recommend a higher total gauge cable.

      5. Quality connectors matter

      Truly, the best connectors are no connectors at all. But, if you can’t hardwire your system, gold plated connectors are the industry standard. Gold plating exhibits great corrosion resistance when exposed to oxygen and has good conductive properties. Connectors range from basic to extremely high end and flashy.

      The bottom line is:
      Choose connectors based on your personal needs and the type of connection being made. Overall, always choose quality connectors.  

      We hope these myths and facts will help you choose quality, reasonably priced cables to complete your listening room, studio, or whatever your setup may be.

      Share your setup with us in the comments below!

      128x128shieldedaudio

      Showing 5 responses by dragon1952

      shieldedaudio
      Science can’t even explain how a freakin’ bicycle works yet. Since you’re so smart maybe you can.
      " How Bicycles Work

      Perhaps the most mind-boggling thing that scientists still don’t understand is just how bicycles work. If you thought that it was because of the gyroscopic motion of the wheels, that theory was disproven in the 1970s. Scientists really aren’t sure why bicycles are able to be so stable when ridden. Ever since the gyroscopic theory was disproven, scientists shifted their thinking to something called the caster effect. They thought that the stability of a bicycle came from the angle at which the front wheel made contact with the ground relative to the frame. However, that theory was proven false in 2011 by researchers at Cornell. The mechanics behind the machine of bicycles can be understood rather simply, whether it be gear ratios or friction. However, when it comes down to the actual mechanism that makes bikes stable, scientists aren’t really sure."

      http://https//interestingengineering.com/simplest-things-scientists-cant-explain

      jdeickhoff "As a newbie to this arena, I utilize sites like this to learn from the elder, more experienced, more knowledgeable in the craft.  As an engineer I truly enjoy the science behind each and every detail and yet enjoy the discovery of sound when the ear is the sole compass.  But what I don’t understand is the cannibalistic nature of many members on sites like this. What is it about this topic or this hobby that creates such divisiveness instead of an accepted brotherhood?"

      It's hard to have an "accepted brotherhhood" no matter what the arena when there are views that are totally opposite. It's like being for or against abortion. The one's 'against' literally call the ones 'for' murderers and worse. It's kind of the same with this subject. The one's that believe that science proves their side literally call the other side idiots, morons, fools and all kinds of other derisive terms. It's hard to respond in a brotherly manner. Besides, since you're a self-proclaimed newbie, maybe you don't know that this has been beat into the ground for the past 30 or 40 years already and most people are sick of it.
      " Now, if you believe YOU can hear it, go buy a $100,000 cable. The seller is laughing all the way to the bank, but YOU are happy."

      See, that's a major part of the problem right there. A large percentage that believe cables can and do sound or perform differently don't necessarily believe that the more expensive a cable is the better it has to sound. And they will agree that there is a large amount of snake oil out there. And they are not saying that ALL cables sound different. All they are saying is that they have experimented and found that certain cables have performed better in their systems.
      A large number of people on the other side come out and say that's literally impossible. Many of them have only read a scholarly sounding article or two that made sense to them and justified their own reluctance to spend time and money experimenting for themselves. In other words a large percentage of them have never been curious or bold enough to say, 'hey I'm going to find out for myself and make my own conclusions'. And bias can work both ways. If some believe that a more expensive cable is going to blow them away then some will be biased enough to be blown away. But on the other hand if someone reads a scholarly sounding article that tells them that science and measurements have proven beyond a doubt that there really is no difference and that they are idiots to spend their time and hard earned money chasing something that isn't there, then either they won't experience differences, or they won't even experiment for themselves. They'll just blindly buy into it and jump on the bandwagon to point fingers and laugh. Herd mentality.

      I've experimented with so many different systems and cables over the past 45 years and the most expensive cable I have ever bought was $640. The two sets of interconnects I currently have in my system cost me about $225 each. I've compared them to IC's that were up to $500 a pair and always chose to keep the ones I had, not because I couldn't tell a difference but because mine, the less expensive cable, sounded more to my tastes. Many of the cables I've tried DID sound pretty much the same. And I certainly don't think there are many more expensive cables out there that would outperform mine to a large enough degree to justify the expense. 
      But the bottom line is that no matter how much science and measurements you spew  forth there is still too much that we haven't learned yet, especially when it comes to what the human brain can and does perceive.

      jet88
      Wow, some scary stuff in here. People believing a copper wire has a direction

      Not to take one side or the other, but not all cables are said to be directional. Some manufacturers claim that their cables are ’designed’ to be directional but that claim usually has absolutely NOTHING to do with the conductors themselves. Without wasting my time looking for the exact answer, I believe it has something to do with the ground or the shielding design. Wireworld, however,  does make a claim regarding the grain structure of their conductors which is a result of the manner in which their conductor metals are drawn which doesn't sound totally unbelievable.

      Many, if not most, of those blind tests have a large group of people sitting throughout a room, none of them in the perfect sweet spot, listening to a combination of gear they likely have never listened to before and potentially listening to short pieces of music they are not intimately familiar with. Yet they are being asked to notice differences that may be subtle at best.