petersened6a
Responses from petersened6a
| TACT RCS 2.0 Users Group Re: discussion between Drubin and Audioguy 123.Sorry guys, I have to set a few things straight. Audioguy 123 is absolutely right that the TacT 2.0 does not comply with any of the existing standard techniques for speaker measurements. This is absol... | |
| TACT RCS 2.0 Users Group Regarding sound quality of the digital volume control in 2.0. How do you actually evaluate the sound quality of a digital volume control? If you use it with an external DA converter and a preamplifier then it is very difficult to say if the change... | |
| TACT RCS 2.0 Users Group In response to Audioguy 123 on the subject of Sigtech versus TacT, I have to maintain that there is no way the Sigtech with the limited time and frequency resolution can accurately correct for low frequency variations. Then obviously in your case ... | |
| Tact RCS 2.0 vs. 2.2 The RCS 2.2 is an earlier system than the current RCS2.0. It had a build-in crossover for left/right channel and stereo subwoofers and could do correction for main-speakers and subwoofers separately. The RCS 2.0 is newer, but does not have the cro... | |
| TACT RCS 2.0 Users Group Re: Sigtech versus TacT In response to comments from a Sigtech owner who have tried the TacT 2.0 without immediate success I would like to explain why the Sigtech owner – initially - is less likely to achieve good results with the TacT 2.0 than ot... | |
| TACT RCS 2.0 Users Group Comment to Pls1, 031701Re: Measurement with TacT 2.0 versus MLSSA.It is absolutely true that the measurement performed and displayed by the 2.0 does not match the response when you measure with other measurement systems. In fact no two measurement... |