kichijai
Responses from kichijai
| Ohm Walsh 2 v. 2XO I would stick to the original. the XOs are a couple DB more sensitive but who cares. I believe Ohm punched up the controls (not needed anyway) on the bottom before removing them so these might be less accurate than the regular model. And the 2s ha... | |
| the smoothest sounding speaker Ohm Walshes. Utterly non-fatuiging, with great transparency, imaging, and sounstaging. A no brainer. | |
| Personal speaker evolution Ohm L 1982Ohm Walsh 2 1985Ohm Walsh 3XO 1988Paradigm Titan 1995Mirage M5si 1995NHT SuperOnes 1997 | |
| Acurus or Parasound Well the Parasound HAS to be better because I had an A250 and it was too bright, among other things. Whatever the opposite of musical and non-fatuiging is, that's the Acurus. I have a 70 watt Sherwood receiver from 1983 that sounds better and is n... | |
| Your top 3 comedians George CarlinJake JohannsonNick DiPaolo | |
| Amp for Mirage M-3s Any amp that cost 600 used probably cost a thousand new, and that won't do the M3s full justice. They also need a lot of juice. Acurus sounds too bright and doesn't have enough damping. Parasounds are also on the bright side but do have better woo... |