erikfh
Responses from erikfh
| Dynaudio 1.3SE and 1.3mK....What's the Difference? The differences were also discussed on Audioasylum before.http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=speakers&n=153821&highlight=NoelP&r=&session= | |
| Dynaudio 1.3SE and 1.3mK....What's the Difference? http://www.stereophile.com/standloudspeakers/333/index6.htmlSee also dynaudiousa.com, under 'archived products' in the products tab | |
| Musical Fidelity A5 or A308 integrated? Another musical vote for A308 over A5 to drive Dynaudio (Contour monitors). A5 might provide tighter bass though ( compared A308 pre-pow against A5 pre-pow). | |
| MF Tri Vista or Nu Vista Amp or Pathos Logos Leonx, if you've heard the KW500, then how would you compare it against the Nu-/Triv-Vista? | |
| Dynaudio 72SE vs. S3.4 One difference is that the 3.4 contrary to previous Contours make use of neo-dymium magnets. On high(er) end equipment the difference in performance may become (more) clear though (at least I heard them ahine and marvel through full Mark Levinon p... | |
| any dynaudio crafft information? Hi Vitor,Below links might give some help:http://www.geocities.com/shianjer/index2.htmlAs you might know, these are no longer produced. In Europe they go secondhand for 1,600-2,000 (though 2 months ago a new pair got sold on German E-bay for litt... | |
| Dynaudio Focus? Thanks for explaining Rumadian,It is also not my experience to use exotic audio to enjoy them, rather than a proper current/wattaged amp to keep them in control. Efficiency seems an improvement then over older models, incl. 1.1. Which might be dri... | |
| Dynaudio Focus? Rumadian,Even the identical finishes often have a different effect. This has probably to do with the real veneer coming from different trees etc. Glad you like your pair though, is it is always uncertain how the exact finish will work out when buy... | |
| Dynaudio Focus? Valinar, Given your MF equipment, which I owned in the past to drive the Contour 1.1, I would 'Focus' on either the 110 or the 140, and given the specs of your amp, probably the first.I've read various reviews in European (esp. German) mags and on... | |
| Best components with Dynaudio 52 SE Thanks for your additional comments, Davt. Indeed Dyn's need to be partnered with serious kit (e.g. high-current quality) amp to avoid them to sound (either) forward, harsh, compressed and with a bloathed bass.When fed well, they can be perfect al... | |
| Best components with Dynaudio 52 SE I use VdH The Wind MKII with my Contours 1.3SE and would not look for replacement. This VdH's character is natural, organic, spacious, smooth, with great seperation and clarity and most of all musical to the signal. I sold off a second pair of SE'... | |
| Best components with Dynaudio 52 SE Dav,With what electronics did you hear the 52SE and the 1.4 exactly? I home-demoed them both (on a MF 308 integrated) and the 1.4 outshone the 52SE in all areas. The 1.4's give a bigger sound though, and need more room to breathe. But they appeare... | |
| Alternative to Dynaudio 1.3SE Did you try to drive them with a more powerful amp? You might not except such a rough comment, but I used to drive mine, which are also two feet from the wall measesured as you desribed, with a MF 3.2 power (150 watt) amp and the room was booming ... |