asdf777
Responses from asdf777
| What's next for the ultimate sound quality? The system sensitivity is around 92-93db. The tweeter is 92.5 and woofer is 87, but since there are 2 of them wired in parallel facing the same direction, you get +6db = 93db for the woofers as well. | |
| What's next for the ultimate sound quality? Right. So the consensus seems to be to leave the speakers be and upgrade amplification + install sound panels.If tube amplifiers sound as cool as they look, then I'm sold :) It also seems possible to build one yourself and stick to the DIY philoso... | |
| What's next for the ultimate sound quality? S7horton,Right, I'm quite a newbie and haven't had a lot of opportunity to experiment. In fact, very little. Before building these speakers, and having listened to Seas drivers for 3-4 years (in monitor audio speakers), I bought drivers from Aurum... | |
| What's next for the ultimate sound quality? Shadorne, you got it! The sound is indeed clean, detailed and punchy and slightly damped.Given my ideal sound description (a wall of clean and powerful sound), I've got clean and powerful, but the "wall" is missing.Is tube amp the right answer? Th... | |
| What's next for the ultimate sound quality? Interesting. Tube amp? Never even considered them... To be honest, I thought tube amps were kind of in line with power conditioners and gold cables (i.e., look cool and audiophile, but not really add anything besides design value :) Can they reall... | |
| What's next for the ultimate sound quality? BTW, the receiver may look dorky and cost less than some of your cables, but it sounds quite amazing: it beats my NAD 754 quite easily in the extended bass range and definition and If you look at this thread down below, there is a post that compar... | |
| What's next for the ultimate sound quality? Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of experience with different speakers to compare them with. The best I've heard to date (besides these ones) were monitor audio gold reference 60 ($3K retail). ZRT speakers are a *little* better imho -- they have ... |