LINN Majik vs Classik vs Wakonda vs Kairn


I have owned a Linn Kairn for over 10 years. I have no complaints nor do I ever plan to sell it. Recently I acquired a LINN Majik for a second system and was REALLY amazed at how good it sounds. Even the small 33wpc amp built into the Majik seems capable enough to drive smaller speakers. The excellence of the Majik made me wonder if the LINN Classik Music sounded as good as the Majik or possibly better?

I have also heard that the Wakonda with 'Circular Brilliant' or 'Slimline Brilliant' power supply were very good preamps. Are these two different Wakonda versions better or different sonically than the Majik or Classik Music? I have never heard any reference to the 'Slimline Brilliant' being vastly superior to the 'Circular Brilliant'? (Only that 'Slimline' is just better) My hunch is that the 'Circular Brilliant' is a torroidal transformer inside a shielded case. Does anyone know what's inside the 'Circular Brilliant'?

So, are there any strong opinions as to whether the Classik Music sounds better than the Majik? To my knowledge the Majik does NOT have 'Brilliant' power supply, but I'm not sure about the Classik Music?

Also, having the added convenience of a LINN CD player built into the Classik Music makes it very appealing for a small room...but is this internal LINN CD player really worth the up charge for an all-in-one unit, vs these other LINN offerings like Wakonda or Majik?

How would you compare these four different Linn preamps, sonically, especially the major differences between Majik, Classik and Wakonda? I presume the Kairn is the best of the bunch.

And as a follow-up question, is it safe to 'split' the preamp output on the Majik 2 or 3 times and use one pair to drive an external amp and another pair of outputs to reconnect to the Majik? I can't see any reason why this would harm the Majik, but would there be a limit to how many times you could split the preamp-out signal of ANY preamp? The Classik Music DOES include a dedicated Pre-out, but the Majik does not. Does splitting a pre-out signal effectively split the output power?

Thanks in advance for any comments.
nsmith7
I used to own a Wakonda in a mid-level Linn active system. As part of a new system, I purchased a Placette passive volume control and put it in the Linn system for comparison. It was surpisingly more transparent; it made me appreciate how much the Wakonda, while a good piece of gear, was veiling things. This is perhaps more of a compliment to the Placette, than a criticism of the Wakonda, but the difference was appreciable.
I owned a Majik with the slimline brilliant power supply.
They did upgrade the power supply on the later model Majiks.

Very good, peppy sounding integrated amp.

The beauty of this integrated is the robust power supply and a "mini" Klout amplifier inside, enabling the power output to doubles (66w/ch) into 4 ohms.

Now 66 w/ch. isn't to shabby for a little package.
I recently got a Majik & was pleasntly suprised at the quality. The amp section drove my 87db speakers to quite decent volume levels. I have seen the speakers drawing close to 300Watts on peaks with my ealrlier Mac MC352. The Majik played almost as loud though a bit fussy at these levels.

How can one tell if it's the version with the Slime line power? My integrated is a bit heavy. This means the Klout variant?

I too like to ask the same question as Nsmith7. How good is the pre section of the majik? Can some Linn experts pls. chime in.
If you open the integrated the slimline ps looks just like the name says. It is a chrome slim rectangular shielded case inside. The older brilliant ps was shielded, but round like a toroidal transformer.

The Majik preamp section is a Wakonda.

This integrated is awesome. I added LK100s to bi-amp and they are not as good as the Majik amp section.

Now the LK 85 is supposed to be a great match if you want to bi-amp, if your speakers allow you to.

This is one great integrated and it really does get better w/ Linn speaker cable and interconnects.