2. cables
  3. 1339166458

Nordost Quattro Fil is still good

Close to a year ago I bought a turntable and changed my entire loom to Nordost Heimdall. Before, I was using Red Dawn rev. 2 SC and Quattro Fil XLR from my DAC to amp. Big improvement on overall sound, especially up top, in the treble region.

Fast forward to yesterday. I had the Quattro Fil collecting dust so I purchased some WBT 0152cu RCA plugs and converted them to RCA so I could use them with my new headphone amp. They are significantly stiffer than the Heimdalls so I swapped them. Heimdall on headphone amp and QF on phono stage.

I must say I was pleasantly impressed by what I heard. I don't recall hearing that big a difference between Heimdall XLR and the QF XLR, but on RCA's, the QF were better.

I spun a few albums, but Rush-Hemispheres really stands out. I'd never heard the low end so clear. The QF dug a little deeper, but also separated bass drum/tom tom whacks and the bass line. Compared to the QF, the Heimdall's sounded a bit congested in the bass region. The treble was about the same with just a bit more air with the QF.

Overall, the QF's sounded more refined. I hope they retain this character after a few more hours of break in.

Regarding the plugs, the WBT0152cu are full metal body unlike the WBT0110cu Nordost uses. Maybe cleaning the connectors also contributed to the better sound of the QF.
gherrera1
dbarger
215 posts
 
The quatro fils are excellent. Just a small touch shy of Valhalla in performance, and a step up from Frey. It would a big step up from Heimdall, single ended or balanced.
kurt_tank
1,189 posts
 
I like my Quattro Fil cables too.

Question: Has anyone done a comparision between the Quattro Fil and the Tyr cables, (using balanced terminations especially)?

I use a long (4 meter) balanced Quattro Fil interconnect cable from my Ayre K-1xe to my Lamm M2.1s, (and then bi-wired Valhallas from there to my EgglestonWorks Andra II speakers). I was considering upgrading this interconnect to balanced Valhallas, but they are so darn expensive, especially since I would like to increase the length to 4.5 to 5.0 meters, (as they are stretched pretty tight right now). So I was thinking of compromising by going with the Tyr cables instead, thinking that they might be an upgrade, (albeit not quite an much of an upgrade), from the Quattro Fil cables. (But unless I find a killer deal, or hear from someone that has already compared these two cables, I will probably not be in a hurry to do such an upgrade as I do like the sound as it is.)
gherrera1 OP
88 posts
 
When I compared the QF with Heimdall XLR, I don't recall hearing too much of a difference, but it was on my DAC. Maybe the higher output voltage plus stronger output devices minimized the differences.

That's why I didn't think twice about switching between the two. But after that first listen, I was surprised. It may also be the phono stage is more sensitive to cables.

Then again, since I compared the two in XLR form I had made a couple changes. New listening room, speaker cable, and capacitor upgrade for the power conditioner. As the saying goes...everything matters.
nglazer
845 posts
 
I still use the QF and find it still to be a superb cable. Newer is not necessarily better. Raw materials have increased in price considerably since QF days so you may not be getting the same value for the same price.

Neal
xti16
1,525 posts
 
You should really give the Nordost Series2 a try. Quite different than the original Norse series. Note the Tyr2 has been added to the Norse Series. Much warmer and more 'liquid' sounding than the originals.
More to discover