Valhalla vs. Audience AU 24


Has anyone compared the Valhalla to the Audience speaker cable--and found the latter, as does B. Damkroger in Stereophile, to trump the former? Can this be?
gladstone
When you spend a lot more money on a cable you will Definitely thinks its better. That is until you spend way more on the next one.
Lougiants, you are correct when you state:

I do not doubt that the Valhalla is more transparent, quicker and more detailed - but how much more so can only be answered by auditioning and determining the best bang for the buck in one's own system.

System synergy is everything in this hobby.

.
.
.

Snook2, on the other hand, I disagree with what you wrote:

When you spend a lot more money on a cable you will definitely thinks its better. That is until you spend way more on the next one.

This is not necessarily true.
(And I will point out that this statement sounds rather cynical of our hobby in general.)

When one does a direct comparison between two cables, and one is better than the other, that reveals a true upgrade, regardless of price. One needs to realize that system synergy is incredibly important in this hobby.

As an example: I had tried the Jena Labs Pathfinder speaker cables, which came immediately after my use of the AU24 cables. They are about the same price as the Valhallas, btw. These cables are very musical, especially through the mid-range, (more so than the Valhallas actually). But they seemed to have a bit of a treble roll off that just did not work well with my Lamm amps, (which are already a bit dark sounding). But in my friend's system, these cables sounded wonderful. I actually preferred my AU24 cables, as there was more system synergy, and so I continued my search for the perfect speaker cable for my system. (Which I believe I have found in the Valhallas.)
Kurt if you like the Valhallas wait till you hear the Odin supreme reference.